S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (DropLockBob),
950
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,489
Posts561,994
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 454 Likes: 129
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 454 Likes: 129 |
as ted has stated, pretty well any french gun in sound condition is well within the bounds of safety - when it is used with appropriate cartridges. even guns with basic single proofing, have been tested at, or above, the pressures used by other nations proofing processes....that fact holds generally true going back 150 years. your gun was chambered for 2.5" shells, which have become more and more difficult to secure in recent years - although the post this morning regarding b & p shells might be worth pursuing. most of us who fancy these older guns are reloaders...for the simple reason it is the only reliable way to access appropriate cartridges.
the other possibility with your gun, is having the chambers properly lengthened to 70mm (2 3/4"), or having the forcing cones conservatively lengthened. stay away from the popular long forcing cone reamers, as they will remove quite a bit of metal from the critical area where pressures are at their greatest. properly done, this will allow a much wider choice of factory shells - but should not be taken as permission to shoot just any cheap(er) shells that happen to be available. your gun could be the pre 1923 re-enforced proof, or the post 1923 double proof - either way it is a well built and quite strong gun.
based on the photos you provided, the gun appears to be in nice condition, and of a pretty standard st. etienne helice gun. the action was widely copied and used by any number of builders, and similar to your gun, they will be seen with many different names....some who actually built a finished gun using available components - and some who simply ordered guns marked with the sellers name. st. etienne was a major gunmaking center, and everything there was for sale. the low serial number (293) could be either a small finisher shop, or retailer - there were so many that they are impossible to account for all.
argo44 can direct you to threads here that have detailed discussions about the helice system...suffice it to say they are quite strong, and can easily be rendered in strong, light, handy field guns, that are very serviceable. they typically are fairly short barreled, and usually choked with 25-30 thou constriction in the right tube, and 40+ thou in the left. they are normally stocked with useful dimensions, and make fine field guns...just keep the ammo properly suited for light weight guns. while not common in this country, they abound in france - while they have no great value, they do offer a lot of gun for a very reasonable price....enjoy it.
best regards,
tom
"it's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards." lewis carroll, Alice in Wonderland
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,535 Likes: 451
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,535 Likes: 451 |
We've had a number of conversations about a supposed "Helice" system. Actually a "Helice" top lever doesn't really exist. It is a copy of the Verney-Carron patent which he filed in 1896 under the name "Helice-Grip," "Helicobloc" and a couple of others. Here is one discussion: https://doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=497660&page=4Basically VC turned the Webley-Scott top lever upside down. You can identify the difference by the lack of a screw slot on the top lever on the VC copies. The VC patent became wildly popular in Saint-Etienne and after its expiration, dozens of firms engraved "Helice" (which means "helical") on their top levers - kind of an advertisement for quality (sort of like "organic" today). There are several other discussions on this topic on this board and a collage of various top levers with Helice on them. (Note the one gun lower right hand corner that has "Helice Gripp, Brevete" (Patented Helice Gripp) but which is using a Scott Spindel not a VC patent. He snuck in "Helice Gripp" by adding a "p"). ![[Linked Image from jpgbox.com]](https://www.jpgbox.com/jpg/56554_662x768.jpg) Neltir, a French gunsmith who worked in the industry for 50 years didn't much like VC and had this to say (translated): Verney Carron? well, all he did was simply modify the triple lock HELICE system of Webley to a system still more reliable with quadruple locks called HELICOBLOC on which Verney Carron took out a patent in 1896!I'll add to Tom's post that the standard French barrel length is 27.5" and the standard chamber length is 65mm (2 1/2" inches). As mentioned above from 1889 to we now believe 1924 Saint-Etienne stamped chamber lengths in cm (6.5 vice 65). Before 1889 and from 1924 on they were stamped in mm. We have had numerous discussions on shooting 2 3/4" shells out of 2 1/2" chambers. I believe the last word was that this can be done and is no threat to the gun if reasonable muzzle velocities are used. . .and actually may be better than lengthening the chambers. https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=607886&page=1https://doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=296938https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=34328&page=1
Last edited by Argo44; 08/20/24 10:54 PM.
Baluch are not Brahui, Brahui are Baluch
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355 |
Lot of dead guys in that old post, Gene.
Low pressure 2 3/4” loads will be fine in 2 1/2” chambers. I used to advise guys with Darne guns to lengthen the chambers if that was what they wanted to do, but, I’ve eased off on that, after seeing the results of some hack gunsmithing. I don’t believe, correctly done, it is a problem for the gun, just that good gunsmiths aren’t running around in bunches.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 5 Likes: 2
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 5 Likes: 2 |
This gun is in fairly good condition , and i believe it has seen very little use , as i am in the uk , 2 1/2 inch shells are still relatively easy to purchase , Eley vip game cartridges are available quite readily here . It is a lovely little light gun , and walking around the farm for a few hours is really enjoyable . There is a pheasant shoot very close so a lot of them can be seen as well as woodys and rabbits . I feel very lucky to live here . I am. Enjoying reading the threads that have been linked , thanks again for the help and information . Best regards Geoff
|
2 members like this:
Parabola, Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165 |
Getting back (briefly) to the Helice guns: The only trademarks Verney-Carron registered are Helice Grip and Helicobloc. That's according to their 1922 catalog.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 454 Likes: 129
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 454 Likes: 129 |
and, a "point of order" regarding the use of the term "double proof" - and this gets pretty sticky. using steindler's translation of wirnsberger's text on proof marks....from some point (could be 14 july, 1860; could be 22 april, 1868; could be 1869) st. etienne offered a standard "single proof" (consisting of a single st etienne mark), or a "re-enforced proof" (shown by two marks). at no point in his text is the term "re-enforced proof" presented as a double proof, there are three different places where he states "the double imprint of these marks signified re-enforced proof". then in 1885, the parliament approved new rules, which were signed into effect by the president - and this is the event that (inadvertently) canceled obligatory proof in france. and until france joined the rest of the proof countries (at the international proof conference in 1914), all proof testing in france was purely voluntary. steindler states that the arms makers never ceased to proof, and that "the french arms industry gained rather than lost ground and prestige". during this period the marks themselves remained (largely) unchanged. in november 1895, the paris proofhouse was established, and accepted the st. etienne rules for semi-smokeless proofs. as of 30 july 1897, double marks still indicate re-enforced proof, and at some point in 1901, a more powerful proof was introduced in st. etienne (and quickly adopted in paris) - and this where it gets sticky - THREE marks indicated double proof, and FOUR marks indicated triple proof. "On the 18th December 1923, new proof rules were introduced. Retained was the standard and re-enforced proof which was not identical to either the double or triple proof mentioned above, but the proof marks remained the same. Consequently, it has become almost impossible to attempt to 'date' a gun by means of the proof marks unless the year of proof is known. While high or excessive pressures may well show up a fault, either in material or design of a gun, the exploitation of high pressures as a means of advertising became wide spread in France." then on 4 june, 1926, to conform with international standards, french proof marks became typical (and much more easily understood)....one mark is standard (14,223 psi), two marks are double (16.356 psi), and three marks are triple proofed (18,490 psi). if you reference the chart that docdrew provides you will see that it pertains to this post 1923 era....and that fact leaves a large number of guns marked with powder T (starting around 1900) and coming forward until 1923-4, that are subject to much conjecture if they are marked with either two or three stamps. based on my understanding, a single stamp will always mean the same thing - and four stamps will always mean a triple proof (sometime between 1901 and 1924). but, two or three stamps are easily misinterpreted....this should give everyone a chance to scratch their head! best regards, tom wanted to revisit this thread discussing french proofing of shotguns, and add to what i had to say regarding the confusion with two proof marks - as to whether they had been double proofed, or superior/re-enforced proofed. there is a mf robust gun currently at auction on gunbroker that has some potentially useful markings....https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1065265989 the tubes have two proof marks - and are accompanied by "epreuve officielle superibuhe" (?), which clearly indicates that the proofing was the re-enforced proof....additionally the gun has chamber markings in cm's. from a posting by argo44 on 10 sept 17 (post #489750) there is a listing of model numbers used on robusts - which indicates that model #8 was introduced in 1914, and last shown in 1922....a production period of nine years, which may provide some additional measurement on both those uncertainties. and, i also am caretaker of mf ideal #26831, which is listed as a 1906 gun, that has three proof stamps, and is also marked "double epreuve", and has chambers marked in cm's - "7". this gun is a "directors marked" special order gun. so, nothing that settles things for-once-and-for-all; but a bit more information....at least mf marked some guns (upper grades?) with definitive evidence of what the number of stamps actually meant. best regards, tom
"it's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards." lewis carroll, Alice in Wonderland
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355 |
Manufrance was a different deal than the smaller builders, and, the cottage industry that helped to support the small builders. For a time, Manu could and did proof their own guns. If you needed, say, a coffee grinder, a bicycle, a motorcycle, silverware, luggage, or any of a thousand or more other household items, they had you covered. Many of the cottage industry folks were going home, and breaking the law by working part time doing engraving, fitting, stock work or anything else that went into the production of a consumer gun. They didn’t produce anything with an idea that it would be history, but, more with the idea that it helped pay the bills. The socialists in charge didn’t want them working part time, thus, the less said was better.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 169 Likes: 46
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 169 Likes: 46 |
![[Linked Image from i.goopics.net]](https://i.goopics.net/800/n9ak1x.jpg) Salut, Voici le tableau des charges utilisées par le banc d'épreuve de Saint-Etienne pour les canons finis, dans la période 1902/1923. Les canons du Robust, ainsi que ceux de votre Idéal, ont été éprouvés dans cette période. À ma connaissance, seul Darne a utilisé la triple épreuve 4 palmes pour ces canons haut de gamme. PS : Le brevet "Hélice Grip" de Verney-Carron ne date de 1896, comme on le lit souvent sur les forums, mais de 1907.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,718 Likes: 1355 |
Fab Un grand merci pour les faits d'où les armes ont été fabriquées.
Sinceres salutations,
Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460 |
|
|
|
|
|