S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,488
Posts561,985
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346 |
Along the same lines as this off-topic thread, is the topic of wellness interviews at your primary care, physicians office.
I am surprised that no one has been outraged by the set of questions routinely asked by their primary care physician’s interviewing staff. Those people are the real enemy. Their questions are clearly a trap designed to take your guns.
Being that this website is populated by people that must be visiting their physicians regularly, one would think they get asked these questions all the time.
Are there guns in your house? Do you keep them locked up? Do you drink? Do you use drugs? And any number of other questions that undoubtedly were concocted to be used as a way to seize something from you, or control you in someway. Those mental health questions where are you have to add up all the points. Every time you go into the office are clearly an avenue to be used to seize your guns and lock you up in a mental institution.
How come nobody seems outraged on a daily basis about that stuff?
Lloyd broke his leg, unless he bit down on a stick and set it himself, I would’ve thought he would’ve been outraged by all those inquiries? Why worry about it, it's the standard of care today, certainly crafted in part from the pages of the JAMA. Looked over by others, of course. What should empower you is the prof, doing great research through bountiful grants.....and paying himself to write more grants.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346 |
.....You sound like an expert on the academic medical publishing industry, craig.... Thanks prof, you might be smarter than you look.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346 |
.....BTW: since then, the Presidents of Harvard and Stanford lost their positions related to academic fraud. Everybody (eventually) gets caught. If only it were so. They stepped down due to unnecessary, self created negative optics. They were a bit to hasty in pushing far left agendas, and the fraud remains intact?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,510 Likes: 567
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,510 Likes: 567 |
.....You sound like an expert on the academic medical publishing industry, craig.... Thanks prof, you might be smarter than you look. Sadly, you are not. And that's pretty bad.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,708 Likes: 346 |
.....You sound like an expert on the academic medical publishing industry, craig.... Thanks prof, you might be smarter than you look. Sadly, you are not. And that's pretty bad. You have a point, but at least I can fall back on my gig as an expert on the academic medical publishing industry. Even with lipstick, you're still a secular progessive, trying to finish off the best that remains of America, huh prof.
|
|
|
|
|