|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (GETTEMANS),
433
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,561
Posts562,809
Members14,597
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,251 Likes: 425
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,251 Likes: 425 |
In my case, I just want to read without being bothered.
Because I use five different devices for reading, and at any time the system updates on one will change its online identity, and prevent me from logging in.
whatever the settings are on one device may not be the same as what they are on another.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,035 Likes: 1835
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,035 Likes: 1835 |
How would you be bothered, CZ? Do you think someone would see you were online and send you a private message you wouldn't want to answer right then? I can't think of any other reason, right off. You wouldn't be obligated to answer a p.m. immediately anyway. I think everyone realizes that we might not notice we have a new p.m. immediately.
Again, not arguing, just trying to make sense of it.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,251 Likes: 425
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,251 Likes: 425 |
Maybe you are misremembering I was even a part of this thread.
No one will remember or care by darkness.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608 |
According to what I see reposted by others here on this thread there are some who seem to be saying they are hiding their online status for the sake of privacy? It just goes over my head that someone can want privacy and be posting on a thread here at the same time. I do NOT want to argue about this, and I'm not being "nosey". I don't want to convince anybody that what they're doing is wrong, or right. I just want to understand. I'm thinking possibly I'm missing out on some opportunities here that I am not aware of.
I would be totally happy if I get some reasonable explanations, from anyone who can understand the reasons......... not just the ones who hide their online status. I'm not picking on anybody in particular. I haven't, and won't, mention any names. But, the old cliche' "Hit dog hollers" does come to mind. Be very careful Stan, lest Jimmy W thinks that you've been peeking at my posts after you have loudly proclaimed that you have me on ignore. But that aside, why are you so intensely curious, and why do you even know who has elected to stay private with respect to their attendance? You seem to be quite a snoop. Are you stalking someone? Maybe you shpuld come clean with off-smelling aspirations, eh? And of course, you, Ted, give a [censored - come on man!]. You are always first to have Stan's back and look for an opportunity to take another dig at somebody for whatever reason that makes you feel better about yourself. You are quite the acolyte. Keep trolling, Stanly. Eventually, you will hook a whopper.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/ ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/qclHjMQ.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382 |
According to what I see reposted by others here on this thread there are some who seem to be saying they are hiding their online status for the sake of privacy? It just goes over my head that someone can want privacy and be posting on a thread here at the same time. I do NOT want to argue about this, and I'm not being "nosey". I don't want to convince anybody that what they're doing is wrong, or right. I just want to understand. I'm thinking possibly I'm missing out on some opportunities here that I am not aware of.
I would be totally happy if I get some reasonable explanations, from anyone who can understand the reasons......... not just the ones who hide their online status. I'm not picking on anybody in particular. I haven't, and won't, mention any names. But, the old cliche' "Hit dog hollers" does come to mind. Be very careful Stan, lest Jimmy W thinks that you've been peeking at my posts after you have loudly proclaimed that you have me on ignore. But that aside, why are you so intensely curious, and why do you even know who has elected to stay private with respect to their attendance? You seem to be quite a snoop. Are you stalking someone? Maybe you shpuld come clean with off-smelling aspirations, eh? And of course, you, Ted, give a [censored - come on man!]. You are always first to have Stan's back and look for an opportunity to take another dig at somebody for whatever reason that makes you feel better about yourself. You are quite the acolyte. Keep trolling, Stanly. Eventually, you will hook a whopper. HA HA HA! Pretty sure jimmy outed you as the guy who emails him with the comments from folk he is ignoring. So, you gents have that covered. No, Mr. Brent, I don’t GAF aboot Detroit or Paris. Same problems, same people in charge. Do try to keep up. Stan just asked a question. I don’t believe anyone has or needs to have his back in this instance. The debate results got you down, or, what? Awful cranky, you seem to be. Best, Ted _____________________________________________________________________ CZ, pretty sure this will veer into golf, and then nobody will care by sunset….
|
|
2 members like this:
David Williamson, John Roberts |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608 |
Excellent Ted, but you don't have to send Stan my posts. He reads them all.
And watch your spelling.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382 |
Excellent Ted, but you don't have to send Stan my posts. He reads them all.
And watch your spelling. Canadian slang, Prof. You wouldn’t get it, it seems. Best, Ted _____________________________________________________ People from Detroit hear it all the time. Probably helps if they don’t have their head in their arse.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,544 Likes: 608 |
Excellent Ted, but you don't have to send Stan my posts. He reads them all.
And watch your spelling. Canadian slang, Prof. You wouldn’t get it, it seems. Best, Ted _____________________________________________________ People from Detroit hear it all the time. Probably helps if they don’t have their head in their arse. Sure, Ted. Did Stan give you a nice pat on the back and an 'atta boy?
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1382 |
Excellent Ted, but you don't have to send Stan my posts. He reads them all.
And watch your spelling. Canadian slang, Prof. You wouldn’t get it, it seems. Best, Ted _____________________________________________________ People from Detroit hear it all the time. Probably helps if they don’t have their head in their arse. Sure, Ted. Did Stan give you a nice pat on the back and an 'atta boy? You can look at his online status and likely figure that out, prof. Best, Ted ______________________________________________________ So highly educated, yet, so very needy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,035 Likes: 1835
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,035 Likes: 1835 |
According to what I see reposted by others here on this thread there are some who seem to be saying they are hiding their online status for the sake of privacy? It just goes over my head that someone can want privacy and be posting on a thread here at the same time. I do NOT want to argue about this, and I'm not being "nosey". I don't want to convince anybody that what they're doing is wrong, or right. I just want to understand. I'm thinking possibly I'm missing out on some opportunities here that I am not aware of.
I would be totally happy if I get some reasonable explanations, from anyone who can understand the reasons......... not just the ones who hide their online status. I'm not picking on anybody in particular. I haven't, and won't, mention any names. But, the old cliche' "Hit dog hollers" does come to mind. Be very careful Stan, lest Jimmy W thinks that you've been peeking at my posts after you have loudly proclaimed that you have me on ignore. But that aside, why are you so intensely curious, and why do you even know who has elected to stay private with respect to their attendance? You seem to be quite a snoop. Are you stalking someone? Maybe you shpuld come clean with off-smelling aspirations, eh? And of course, you, Ted, give a [censored - come on man!]. You are always first to have Stan's back and look for an opportunity to take another dig at somebody for whatever reason that makes you feel better about yourself. You are quite the acolyte. Keep trolling, Stanly. Eventually, you will hook a whopper. HA HA HA! Pretty sure jimmy outed you as the guy who emails him with the comments from folk he is ignoring. So, you gents have that covered. No, Mr. Brent, I don’t GAF aboot Detroit or Paris. Same problems, same people in charge. Do try to keep up. Stan just asked a question. I don’t believe anyone has or needs to have his back in this instance. The debate results got you down, or, what? Awful cranky, you seem to be. Best, Ted _____________________________________________________________________ CZ, pretty sure this will veer into golf, and then nobody will care by sunset…. Seems nobody really cares to get deep into why they choose to hide their online status. CZ ventured, actually, but refuses to explain. I have had one private message from a stand-up guy who told me his reason, and I respect it. BTW, I hadn't even noticed he was one of those who hid his online status. Regardless what my detractors claim, I have no ulterior motives with my query. Just trying to understand the reasons. But, I must admit, it's fun that it bothers them so much.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
1 member likes this:
BrentD, Prof |
|
|
|
|
