Originally Posted by Jimmy W
And just for the record, I still have Stanton, Ted, keith and a few others on my ignore list, so I can't see what they are saying in their posts and will not comment on their remarks. But, I still CAN SEE on the front page under THREAD TITLE who started a thread. So, just ignoring what they say in a post works for me. I never said I won't comment in a thread they start, but I will still keep what they say in their posts on my ignore list. That way THEY will be the responsible ones for ruining people's threads like they did Mark21's. I'm happy!! It's like an OUTGOING CALLS ONLY on a telephone. I can say what I want, where I want, but I can't receive anything that I don't want to see or hear from these people on my ignore list. And by the way Stanton, great thread! And there's no need to comment anymore. I won't see or read it. Works for me!! So, let's keep it that way!! 🤪

Jimmy, I'd like to thank you for explaining how you responded to Ted's comment about not really IGNORING Stan.... even though you also IGNORE Ted.

It takes a very "special" talent to be able to see and respond to Posts that you claim to IGNORE. Knowing you have that "special" talent is why I am responding to you. Even though you are IGNORING me too, you have shown all of us that you have the unique and "special" ability to see what you claim you do not see. So I am confident you will see this thank-you message, and that you will understand how grateful we are to see you using this "special" talent.

Stan likened your initial response as being "Like a moth to a flame." Personally, I think moths are smarter.

It must be a Liberal Left thing, because other Liberals here have demonstrated the same unique talent of reading and responding to Posts and Threads that they are IGNORING. It appears to be some sort of Liberal coping mechanism, or perhaps an Internet Safe Space for sensitive and thin-skinned types.

BTW, Marks21's Lefever Thread was ruined when he deleted the two photos he had posted without any description or commentary. He was apparently offended by Ed saying he didn't care for such gaudy embellishment on a gun, which is a matter of taste, and not offensive in the least. He also claimed there was a "lack of interest", but several guys had showed interest. Everything else happened after he torpedoed his own Thread by deleting his original content, and you were in the mix. Of course, you went back and deleted your last few Trolling Posts in that Thread... so you can act innocent now. Your deletions are still there, so you can hope everyone you wish to fool IGNORES that. You're a hoot Jimmy. Thanks for the laughs!


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug