doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Bump Stock Ban.........OT

.

That is good to hear. Not necessarily a fan of bump stocks, but most assuredly NOT a fan of renegade agencies allowed to make up "laws" as they go.

YOu mean the "law" that Trump ordered the BATF to enforce?

.

Not a fan of bump stocks or some of the Supreme Court's extreme gun rulings, but this sort of make sense when you look at the definition in the law of a Machine Gun. "A firearm that fires more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger".

Perry seemed to be referencing something different.

Bump stocks do not make a firearm fire multiple shots with a single pull of the trigger. The trigger still has to be pulled/tripped for each round, they just make them easier to manipulate-te that way. If a bump stock renders a firearm an automatic, then even double action revolver and semi-auto handgun would be classified as such as double taping under recoil is not uncommon.

A friend of mine used to shoot his AR from the hip and hook his thumb in his belt loop. It had the same effect as a bump stock. He couldn't hit much but he had a lot of fun. I hope Trippy Joe, Kakala Harris, Nazi Pelosi, Schmuck Tumor, or Adam Schiffhead don't read this or they will want to outlaw belt loops.

If curious, please read Federalist 29 by Hamilton and you will understand that the founding fathers wanted us to equally armed as the army. This was to allay the fears people historically had for standing armies.

By the way, the Second Amendment does not accede to the God given right to keep and bear guns, it accedes to the right to "keep and bear arms." That means all laws that infringe on the possession of knives, brass knuckles, bows, spears, bayonets, guns, etc. are illegal. The federal government has one function in regards to the peoples' possession of arms and that is to see that no state or local government infringes on their right.

I hope I preach to the choir.

"Corruptissima in republica pluramae leges." Thus spake Tacitus

😃

So once again, we have JimmyW doing more Liberal Democrat Trolling, and the Nutty Professor making more of his anti-Trump political posts.

This is the same petty hypocrite who said this about political posts less than 10 days ago:


Here is another recent example of the Nutty Professor dishonestly accusing Trump of inciting an insurrection... one of several political posts he made in a single Thread:


Please understand that the Nutty Professor and other Libtards here are only concerned with shutting down any political posts or comments that are critical of anti-2nd Amendment Democrats. You and I are supposed to shut up while Liberal Democrats like the Nutty Professor and Jimmy continue to bash Trump and pro-gun rights Conservatives.

Notice that these Biden supporters will never mention the constant assault on the 2nd Amendment made by anti-gun Democrats. And don't forget that this Supreme Court reversal was done in a 6-3 decision where all of Trump's nominees supported gun rights, and all of the Justices nominated by anti-gun Democrats supported the Bump Stock ban. Imagine how it would have went if Hillary Clinton had been elected, and put more anti-gunners on the Supreme Court.

In the months after the Las Vegas mass shooting, anti-gun Democrats wanted a lot more new gun laws than a Bump Stock ban, and Trump was criticized for not doing enough. This is an example of what happens when Conservatives attempt to compromise with anti-gun Democrats.

And this should also be a lesson that we should not accept lies and misinformation from anti-gun Democrat members here, who say that 2nd Amendment politics are the death of this forum. They are NOT on our side, and they never will be on our side.