S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,612
Posts546,983
Members14,427
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9 |
Hello Gentlemen, long time reader 1st time poster.
I recently purchased what I believe to be a Pre-1913 LC Smith SxS as an investment. Untouched gun with 98%? barrel and trigger guard blue with 100% of the case color and sharp details and perfect screws. Minor closet marks on the gun. I have done all my research and believe I've uncovered everything I need with exception of a few things which is why I'm starting this thread in hopes of receiving some of your knowledge. Here is what I know so far,,,,,
Description • Grade No. 0, 1901- L.C. Smith • Production Run - 4,195 • Regular Weight • 12 Gauge • 26" Twist Steel Barrel • Double triggers • Twin Extractor • Splinter Forearm • Stock size 14 3/8" x 1 5/8" x 3" Aprox. • Vintage White Line Pachmayer recoil pad.
Markings • S/N 106718 • PAT’D MAR 29.83 • JULY 13.86 • Let me know if you guys want to see some pics in case I elect to not keep her. R, ChiefC
Last edited by ChiefC; 04/21/24 12:21 PM. Reason: forum member correction
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110 |
The 0-graded was introduced in 1895, after the move to Fulton, so Syracuse is wrong. From 1895 to 1899 the 0-grade came with twist barrels and with good Damascus barrels from 1899 to 1907 when the option of London Steel barrels was introduced. Certainly not " • Original White Line Pachmayer recoil pad." as they didn't come along until after WW-II. For a few years prior to WW-II and a while after there was the Fray-Mershon "Whiteline" recoil pads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,143 Likes: 604
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,143 Likes: 604 |
The serial number should give you an answer as to it's birthdate (I'm finding 1901 for it). More information than that would likely have to come from the LC Smith website. The "whiteline pad" would be troubling for me and I would suspect that it's been restored by somebody along the 123-years it's been around. Hopefully they were competent when they recolored the action and refinished those "Twist" tubes?
Last edited by Lloyd3; 04/19/24 02:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9 |
Hello Sidelock,
Thanks for the quick reply, most of the details I uncovered were from the LC Smith collector site. According to Collector site No. 00's were single triggered and the No. 0 is the only other LC Smith without engraving and twin triggers. I was hoping someone could confirm the 1901 year based upon the serial number.
My apologies on the use of "Original" for the recoil pad, I meant to say it was an original vintage Pachmayer pad, not original LC Smith recoil pad, Ill update above.
So, confirmation of my questions in blue still stand if someone out there can help or point me in the right direction, thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,143 Likes: 604
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,143 Likes: 604 |
Short answer...pre-1913 guns have had more human interaction involved in their manufacture. Even in the lower grades there are some nice touches (bushed firing pins, better shaped actions, nicer wood-to metal-fit and even better wood).
Last edited by Lloyd3; 04/19/24 03:15 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9 |
Hello LLoyd3,
I was familiar with additional gun history which can be purchased after purchasing a membership on LC Smith site. That is a road Ill cross once I decide if I'm keeping her. In all reality I prefer my hammerless Remington 1893 SxS, it fits better. Just checking here first in case someone has access to different information.
You bring up a good point though concerning recoil pad and it having been potentially restored. I took it down to Billy an old Chief (who probably fought in the big one) where I bird hunt because I suspected the barrels having been re-blued and he said "no", that's when he mentioned all original LC Smiths barrels come in a dull brown-blue hue. Hence, I was trying to confirm if the information he shared with me was accurate.
Like you I am leaning towards restored but am certainly not an expert and this is the first LC Smith I've owned/held. I base my observation on some stain runs under the splinter hand guard when I disassembled to match up all serial number stampings, but who knows maybe only the stocks were re-stained.
Maybe posting some pics would clear things up, going to see if I can update original post with a couple of pics.
Last edited by ChiefC; 04/19/24 03:26 PM. Reason: spelling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,743 Likes: 57
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,743 Likes: 57 |
ChiefC, they made 4,195 No. 0's in 1901 when your gun was made. After 1912 they became Ideal Grades. The Damascus barrels were done in black/white and after time changed to a brownish color. Everything else stated is correct. Still a nice gun to own and shoot.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 9 |
Short answer...pre-1913 guns have had more human interaction involved in their manufacture. Even in the lower grades there are some nice touches (bushed firing pins, better shaped actions, nicer wood-to metal-fit and even better wood). Thanks again Lloyd, that answers/confirms 1901 as production year and Quality as why Pre-1913 Smiths are sought after a little more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,440 Likes: 317
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,440 Likes: 317 |
Both the No. 00 and No. 0 were available with the HOT after introduction 1904-1905 "all original LC Smiths barrels come in a dull brown-blue hue" is incorrect. As David said they were finished in "black & white" Full size high resolution images are easy to post on the LCSCA site, and there are certainly experts there who could help decide if the gun has been refinished.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,819 Likes: 126
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,819 Likes: 126 |
I have 1901 for the 10 and 12 gauge (non-ejector). The year 1900 ended at 105917 for the 10 and 12 gauge (non-ejector). The serial numbers in 1901 went up to 111681 for that year. So, 1901 is correct.
Last edited by Jimmy W; 04/19/24 09:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|