S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (Steve Nash),
680
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,492
Posts562,041
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673 |
Wow, I felt that Jimmy's thought process was akin to the religious zealotry of a radicalized Muslim suicide bomber... but CJF is off the charts here when it comes to Trump Derangement Syndrome and disdain for all Republicans.
This is an obvious Biden voter who's claims he was a devout Republican until 2016 when he became an Independent. Then there was some unexplained transformation that caused him to suddenly feel that Republicans are no longer for the People, and only subservient to billionaire donors. This sounds oddly familiar here. Oh, I know why, and I'm also noticing all of the "Likes" CJF is getting from another Liberal Left pretender... none other than Stevie, the Free Advertising gunsmith... another Trump basher who also claims to be an "Independent Moderate". However, when it comes to bashing politicians, we see that virtually all of his/her criticism is leveled at Conservative 2nd Amendment supporting Republicans.
My takes from CJF's diatribe is this is a diehard Democrat. This is someone who, right out of the gate, says he won't even discuss anything with anyone who dares to question the 2020 Election, and the mounds of evidence that there was massive fraud that favored Biden. These people can actually watch "2000 Mules" and see video of Democrat Mules illegally stuffing large piles of ballots into unattended Drop Boxes, and then move on to repeat the same illegal Ballot Box stuffing at another location. And then say they see nothing wrong. Or that was "Debunked" by some wacked out Liberals at MSNBC or Politico. We know several state, including my own, violated their State Constitutions and accepted and counted illegal ballots. So much more, but why bother, because these Democrat "See No Evil" monkeys can only repeat the mantra that 2020 was the most secure election in history, and anyone who questions it is a denier unworthy of debate.
I really liked the line from CJF about equal enforcement of the laws. Democrats all seem to be able to say this with a straight face. And none of them have a problem with direct evidence to the contrary. We see Trump getting hit with and huge FBI raid and dozens of felony charges for holding onto White House documents, while their savior Biden held White House documents in his garage and other unsecured locations. We see Roger Stone convicted and jailed for not defying a Congressional Subpoena, while Hunter Biden and Obama officials Rahm Emmanuel and David Simas were not charged. Then we see Jan' 6th protesters jailed without bond, tried and convicted, while BLM and Antifa rioters who burned cities, Courthouses, Churches, Stores, Police Cars, etc. not even charged. People who sing religious songs outside of an Abortion Clinic are charged with crime while those who violated Federal Law by protesting and threatening outside of the homes of Supreme Court Justices are not charged by Biden DOJ. We see New York temporarily changing Statute of Limitations Laws to allow E.Jean Carrol to file frivolous lawsuits against Trump, without any evidence, while more credible claims of assault on women by Clinton and Biden are brushed aside.
CJF claims his income taxes rose under Trump tax cuts. I'd like to see the proof. The only way that happened would be if CJF earned more money or did something like taking some short term capital gains, etc. I can see it now. The Trump Tax Cuts are due to expire. If reelected through more fraud and cheating, Biden will allow taxes to go up. And CJF will blame Trump for that too.
But it gets much better when CJF blames Trump for destabilizing Russia, China, and the Middle East. So we had no new wars under Trump, Putin and Kim Jung Un behaved and didn't shoot missiles or attack anyone. ISIS was wiped out. Iran was on the verge of collapse, and unable to fund Hamas or Hezbollah. Then Biden gets in and China is threatening to take Taiwan. We have the totally bungled Afghanistan withdrawal, Putin invades Ukraine (as he invaded Crimea and the Donbas region under Obama) and Islamic terrorists are attacking Israel and U.S. ships. And somehow this is Trump's fault???
This guy must be smoking some of the fentanyl and illegal drugs that are pouring in through the Border. But CJF even blames the invasion of Illegal immigrants on Trump and says Biden has done a better job. That's some really funny shit. We have Biden obstructing justice by stopping Border Patrol and INS agents from doing the job we are all paying them to do. We have Biden ordering Border Wall gates to be welded in the OPEN position, and selling off uninstalled sections of the Wall at a huge loss to taxpayers. We have Biden suing Texas for putting up razor wire and doing the job the Feds won't do. We have at minimum, quadrupled the number of illegals entering the U.S. We have Sanctuary cities complaining about being overwhelmed with Illegals. We have over 100,000 people per year dying from drug overdoses. Democrats are silent about that, yet will try to pass more gun laws if a wee tiny minuscule fraction of that number die in a shooting. Yet CJF is telling us that Biden is doing a great job of securing the border. This guy makes Rocky Mtn Bill and nca225 look like Conservatives!
The we saw CJF complaining about Supreme Court Justices taking gifts, while somehow ignoring the ethics scandal where Sotomoyer's taxpayer paid staff were directed to strong-arm Universities where she was speaking (for money) to buy many copies of her book, to sell to students and attendees. Just one incident of this at one University netted over $100,000 in book sales. Nothing to see here! Then CJF pretends to see no link between Soros funded Prosecutors who refuse to file charges against looters, smash and grab flash mobs, and shoplifters, and the massive rise in retail theft in Democrat run cities. Even California Governor Gavin Newsom witnessed someone leaving a Target store without paying, and pointed it out to an employee. She didn't know who he was, and told him they don't even try to stop shoplifters due to the laws passed by the Governor. But CJF fails to see any connection. It looks as if the late anti-gun Canadian Liberal King Brown has been reincarnated.
I thought the brainwashed religious zealotry Jimmy shows with his devotion to Global Warming propaganda was something, but he doesn't hold a candle to CJF the self described Independent. I keep wondering who could actually still support Biden for reelection after seeing the inflation, higher energy costs, the corruption, weaponizing of the Justice Dept., the invasion at the Border, the foreign policy blunders that have experts warning us we could be close to another World War, the grooming of children by transgenders in public schools, etc. Now I know.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Off Topic, but interesting
|
Lloyd3
|
02/05/24 05:09 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/05/24 05:18 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/05/24 06:27 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/05/24 08:48 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 12:12 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:02 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/06/24 01:08 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 01:36 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:48 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 12:16 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
ClapperZapper
|
02/05/24 07:07 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/05/24 07:36 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/05/24 09:14 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/05/24 09:45 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Lloyd3
|
02/05/24 08:05 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Lloyd3
|
02/05/24 10:09 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
ClapperZapper
|
02/05/24 10:09 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/05/24 10:12 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, political bandwagon stuff
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/05/24 10:16 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/06/24 11:02 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, political bandwagon stuff
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/05/24 10:13 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, political bandwagon stuff
|
ClapperZapper
|
02/05/24 10:39 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
craigd
|
02/06/24 12:30 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, political bandwagon stuff
|
CJF
|
02/06/24 12:07 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:16 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/06/24 01:28 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:39 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 01:45 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:51 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 01:52 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 01:56 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/06/24 02:02 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 02:31 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
CJF
|
02/06/24 01:56 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
02/06/24 09:37 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/06/24 02:18 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/06/24 02:25 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
craigd
|
02/06/24 12:53 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 03:19 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 12:23 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
keith
|
02/06/24 04:37 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
ed good
|
02/06/24 01:17 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/06/24 08:46 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/06/24 03:08 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Lloyd3
|
02/06/24 04:32 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
canvasback
|
02/06/24 09:08 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/06/24 10:23 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 11:15 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
canvasback
|
02/06/24 11:46 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 02:48 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Tim in PA
|
02/07/24 04:34 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 01:24 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
canvasback
|
02/07/24 02:04 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/06/24 11:45 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
canvasback
|
02/06/24 11:59 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
craigd
|
02/07/24 12:06 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
02/07/24 12:38 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/06/24 11:46 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/06/24 11:56 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/06/24 11:57 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
02/07/24 01:28 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
craigd
|
02/07/24 01:52 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
ed good
|
02/07/24 02:05 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
ed good
|
02/07/24 02:19 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/07/24 03:01 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/07/24 03:16 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 03:40 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 03:17 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
canvasback
|
02/07/24 01:59 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 03:21 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 03:36 AM
|
Re: interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/07/24 03:44 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Tim in PA
|
02/07/24 04:04 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 01:45 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/07/24 01:11 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Tim in PA
|
02/07/24 03:48 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 01:16 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 04:03 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/07/24 04:08 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 04:11 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/07/24 04:12 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/07/24 11:34 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 01:18 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/07/24 02:18 PM
|
Re: interesting
|
keith
|
02/07/24 12:15 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 12:52 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/07/24 01:19 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 03:01 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/07/24 04:09 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 04:25 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 04:27 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Lloyd3
|
02/07/24 04:44 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/08/24 02:50 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
keith
|
02/08/24 02:44 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
John Roberts
|
02/07/24 04:46 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/07/24 04:55 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 05:06 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Tim in PA
|
02/07/24 08:03 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 11:31 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/08/24 12:36 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Tim in PA
|
02/08/24 03:24 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
keith
|
02/08/24 02:14 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/07/24 04:59 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/07/24 08:28 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/07/24 10:44 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Mark II
|
02/07/24 08:39 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/08/24 02:03 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 02:37 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/08/24 03:06 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 12:38 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 02:47 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/08/24 03:21 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 12:43 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 02:08 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Jimmy W
|
02/08/24 01:01 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 01:34 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/08/24 02:43 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 02:54 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/08/24 03:29 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
CJF
|
02/08/24 04:38 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
Stanton Hillis
|
02/08/24 03:44 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
BrentD, Prof
|
02/08/24 03:51 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/08/24 10:58 AM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
craigd
|
02/08/24 12:48 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
mc
|
02/08/24 01:27 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
keith
|
02/08/24 02:28 PM
|
Re: Off Topic, but interesting
|
rocky mtn bill
|
02/08/24 02:33 PM
|
|
|
|