S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
339
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,579
Posts546,670
Members14,425
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602 |
I would suspect that both would be doing essentially the same job, but what differentiates them, about half a pound? I would assume that the patterns are comparable. The Skimin & Wood guns are certainly unique (to period and type) but what do they really offer over a 5 3/4 LB 2 1/2-inch 12-bore gun? As much as they intrigue me, I suppose that I'll finally have to give one a try some day to answer that one for myself.
Last edited by Lloyd3; 01/14/24 02:18 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444 |
The 2" is about 3/4 lb lighter (5.25, vs 6.0 lb). But the heavier gun is MUCH more flexible with respect to loads and thus hunting opportunities.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
2 members like this:
Karl Graebner, Parabola |
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602 |
Fair enough, and while one reads about sub-6lb 12s, they are seldom encountered in real life. We had a Lincoln Jeffries BLE come through the shop several years ago that was that light, and while you do hear about the occasional Charles Daily lightweight, I've never personally held one.
Last edited by Lloyd3; 01/14/24 02:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444 |
6# 12s aren't too hard to find but below 6# it gets tougher unless it's a 2". At least, that's my experience. I saw a 5# 11 oz 2.75" english gun somewhere recently, but I can't remember where.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 559 Likes: 56
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 559 Likes: 56 |
Lloyd,
A sub 6 lb 2.5” 12 would be a nice find. Easier to find shells than a 2” gun. This is from the RST site:
“Please only order if you have a 2" chambered gun. We load these shells for that market. Once these shells are out we may never be able load them again. Please be considerate to your fellow gun member.”
Brent,
I sure hope you and Gil get the 2” handloads worked out.
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 922 Likes: 368
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 922 Likes: 368 |
Lloyd,
I would choose a light 2 1/2” gun every time over a 2 inch gun. You can get 21 gram, 24 gram , 7/8 oz. Or 1 oz. loads, fibre or plastic and at a push you can rattle your teeth with 1 1/8 oz. if you can’t get anything else.
Not that I would turn down that 2” H.& H. Royal self-opener I saw advertised if someone offered to throw it in with a couple of slabs of 2” cartridges.
|
2 members like this:
Stanton Hillis, Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444 |
Lloyd,
I would choose a light 2 1/2” gun every time over a 2 inch gun. You can get 21 gram, 24 gram , 7/8 oz. Or 1 oz. loads, fibre or plastic and at a push you can rattle your teeth with 1 1/8 oz. if you can’t get anything else.
Not that I would turn down that 2” H.& H. Royal self-opener I saw advertised if someone offered to throw it in with a couple of slabs of 2” cartridges. Yes, as I said, the heavier, longer chambered gun is more flexible. But it will be heavier, which is really the point of a 2x12. Besides that, why not have something a little more unique, a little more quirky, an little more interesting? As far as I'm concerned, shell availability is a nonissue. If you are going to mess with vintage guns of any chamber length, reloading your own is really the best way to go by far. Even 2.75" shells in the pressures, payload, and shot size you need are often hard to impossible to find for a vintage gun. Makes no sense to worry about store-bought shells. Just make your own and be done with it. Reloading has its own rewards. Of course, I am more than happy to take any H$H Royal, fs someone is offering to give it to me, shells or no shells. I'll take a 2" Skimin and Wood the same way, but that is a facetious argument.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
2 members like this:
FallCreekFan, GLS |
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,137 Likes: 602 |
Parabola: I just finished reading the 2-inch gun posting here (all 24 pages of it). I'm weaning off of the oxycontin here today (post surgery, don't want to end-up like Limbaugh) and need to keep myself occupied. Two-inch 12-gauge guns exist in a twilight of-sorts for me. We sold many of them over the years I worked for Mark Reynolds (Skimin & Woods, H&H Dominions, Purdeys, etc.) and I was simply fascinated by them all (I still am). That 2-inch post does what we do best here, which is to research and collaborate on obscure and highly-specialized fine guns. The gifts that are brought to bear on these pages here are almost other-worldly (in that they are shared freely and openly and with such enthusiasm!). I am in awe of what I read here. Years ago, I had to choose between either a good British 16 or a 2-inch 12. Being limited by reality (and possessing a practical nature by necessity), I went with the 16. I have no regrets, other than to still be fascinated by the concept.
Last edited by Lloyd3; 01/14/24 07:46 PM.
|
4 members like this:
graybeardtmm3, FallCreekFan, GLS, Parabola |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,791 Likes: 444 |
Lloyd,
A sub 6 lb 2.5” 12 would be a nice find. Easier to find shells than a 2” gun. This is from the RST site:
“Please only order if you have a 2" chambered gun. We load these shells for that market. Once these shells are out we may never be able load them again. Please be considerate to your fellow gun member.”
Brent,
I sure hope you and Gil get the 2” handloads worked out.
Ken Oh we have. Quite a few grouse suffered the consequences of it too. Another friend with a 2" has his own recipe and we have another from a third source as well. So we can build loads with American Select, Perfect Pattern, and 700-X that will all work in the 2" guns very well. They are actually fun to load, so that's a bonus. I've worked up a spreadsheet of the loads and others (that failed for whatever reason). Anyone with a 2" is certainly welcome to a copy. Amended to add, I have a tested load for SR 7625 as well, if anyone has some of that wonder-powder squirreled away. I have a few pounds that I'm reserving for the 2x12 exclusively. I'd love to find some more.
Last edited by BrentD, Prof; 01/14/24 04:55 PM.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
1 member likes this:
KDGJ |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,786 Likes: 766
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,786 Likes: 766 |
Lloyd, I’m pretty sure that as you sober up, the 2 1/2” 16 gauge will come to make far more practical sense than the 2” 12. The best part is you already own it. Guys quibbling over a half to three quarters of a pound on a hunting gun they use for a few months a year is ‘kinda funny in its own right, too.
Really? Didn’t eat your Wheaties today?
Many years ago, none other than Kirk Merrington told me Americans with a reloading press and an old English shotgun were a huge part of his success here in the states. Yes, we will get the guys here that say “never in 50 years have I done that”, but, you don’t have to look too far on the internet that Al Gore JR. invented to find sad stories of guys that have done just that.
Don’t be that guy.
Sounds like progress on that leg, to me. Looking forward to a few more LOWs experiences, do what the therapist tells you to do. That little restaurant in Roosevelt is calling our names.
Best, Ted
|
2 members like this:
David Williamson, Stanton Hillis |
|
|
|
|