Dogfox is 100% right.
I have to laugh at the way so many shooters flock to Sherman Bell as if he's the Second Coming.
I won't comment as to whether or not his 'findings' are ultimately valid or not - that's because I don't know. Neither does he.
I assume all the guys who take Bell's articles as hard fact have no background in mathematics, statistics, engineering, science, or production. 'Cuz if they did they would immediately spot that his work is meaningless as it ignores the basic rules of statistics and science.
I'd type more but I'm too busy; I'm in the process of writing a new set of rules for physics that will be very popular as they are a lot more forgiving than the current ones.
