October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (SKB), 574 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,496
Posts562,075
Members14,586
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 342
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 342
"You pays your money and takes your choice"
Mike

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 648
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 648
Originally Posted By: Shotgunlover
Boxlock is the OLDER of the two, patented in 1875 while the Purdey sidelock came along in 1880 and the Holland in 1893.The boxlock introduced barrel cocking that made the sidelock possible..


The Scott & Baker patent #761 of 1878 is the hammerless sidelock that I would consider to be the one that started it all in regards to hammerless sidelock Sporting guns.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
A sidelock does not have to be a "BEST" to still be a reliable gun. I do not know what its BV or OQ is, but it is a bottom of the line "Field" grade J P Clabrough & Bro's which one essentially identical to it, lists for $50.00 in an 1895-96 Clabrough & Golcher & Co catalog. It has Damascus barrels. It has pit free barrels & is in sound mechanical condition, though little remaining finish.

In the same catalog, the lowest priced Boxlock Greener listed was $95.00 with the lowest priced w&C Scott sidelock @ $150.00. On the American scene, the Lefever G grade sold for $45.0 with the Baker grade B @ $50.00.

This Clabrough is a well-made gun, even though not an expensive one & is certainly better finished & engraved than either of the American guns listed at about the same price. It is however over 120 years old & remains tight & on the face even though it has no built-in wear compensation. It is double under bolted with a non-bolted Doll's Head rib extension. Both bolts, as well as their seats, are cut parallel to the bore axis with the to lever always stopping at center upon closing.

I have shot a good number of quail, woodcock & cottontails with it. I shoot it better than any gun I have ever owned, including my beloved Lefevers. I have always shot it with 1 oz of shot @around 1150 FPS @ about 8k PSI.

My only exception to ALWAYS preferring a sidelock is the ""Semi-Sidelock" Lefever.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 397
Likes: 12
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 397
Likes: 12
I do like my side locks, beautiful works of functional art. But have to admit, I have taken more upland game birds with a AYA 25 BL. Would pick the BL . Now all bets are off if youre comparing a drop lock!

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 289
Likes: 7
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 289
Likes: 7
I think there is some hair splitting about the date of origin of boxlocks and sidelocks.
The Murcott was a pretty nice sidelock snap underlever patented in 1871. One of our club members has one.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 125
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 125
I prefer sidelock shotguns, but I like boxlock guns too. I do think the top tang safeties are often times more ergonomically placed on sidelocks as compared to boxlocks, but that is not always the case, at least thats what Ive noticed re English. It seems like sidelock safeties are closer to the breech than some of the boxlock English SxS guns Ive handled. Round bodies, like the Dickson are real sweet and arent really classified as boxlock or sidelock guns since they are trigger plate guns.


Socialism is almost the worst.
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 330
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 330
Buzz,
I'm glad that you mentioned round actions. Regarding sidelocks, I much prefer the feel of a round action as opposed to a conventionally edged action. I find that carrying a boxlock with a rounded edge bottom more comfotable on long days afield. I have two conventionally shaped sidelocks, but always reach for the boxlock when hunting.
Perhaps in my next life I can carry a Dickson!
Karl

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Originally Posted By: BrentD
Ted, I agree on all counts.

It may be a tough comparison to make, but I think if Rocketman applied his formulae to external hammer guns, they would be lower valued than sidelocks, but yet, they have pretty similar requirements for inletting and lock manufacture etc. so it would reflect just the demand in the markets. That said it seems that good quality hammer guns have come up in value a little bit (or gone down less) in recent years. But that may be just my imagination.


Auction results, which my valuations are based on, say hammer guns value just about like boxlocks ejectors. There aren't enough hammer ejector guns out and about to differentiate ejectors from non-ejectors. BV of hammergun makers is the same as for SL and BL. CC is also judged as for SL an BL guns. OQ is judged from one to five for SLE's, two to six for SLNE's and from five to nine for BL. That is, a best work BLE will be OQ5 and border engraved BLE will be OQ7. BLNE's will go generally from OQ7 to OQ9 (farmer's tool). Westley Richards sorta split the difference between SLE and BLE for OQ.

DDA

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 971
Likes: 41
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 971
Likes: 41
Saskbooknut,

The Murcott was a lever cocker, and hence not fast enough for driven shooting. The boxlock brought along barrel cocking, increasing the speed of loading. Speed was important in driven game shooting so guys like Lord Ripon could manage 28 pheasants per minute!

Arguably a lever cocker is more suitable for modern walked up hunting, which probably explains the popularity of lever cockers such as the Ideal and the Darne in France.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 289
Likes: 7
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 289
Likes: 7
I am never going to be a driven game shooter. I do love walking up Sharptails and Huns.
The few shots that I fired the Murcott showed it to be a finely made practical gun. It gained my respect.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.660s Queries: 35 (0.162s) Memory: 0.8474 MB (Peak: 1.9020 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-08 21:42:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS