|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,514
Posts562,221
Members14,590
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 978 Likes: 51
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 978 Likes: 51 |
Thanks for the kind words, my friends. Getting ready for winter has kept me busy and away from the keyboard these past days. The pinfire system was a very clever idea, which was not in any way lessened by the better and more successful centre-fire system which replaced it. The pinfire was in use for several decades in France before appearing on the British market in the late 1850s and early 1860s, where despite competing simultaneously with the early centre-fire, it reigned supreme for roughly a decade. Produced by the 'best' makers and unrecognized craftsmen in the back alleys of the Birmingham gun quarter, for the sportsman the gun of choice was the pinfire. Until it wasn't. For the most part the British sporting pinfire was a largely hand-made gun, with steam-powered machinery and machine-made damascus tubes only starting to appear in the waning years. One of the reasons the pinfire is not highly appreciated today is that it is easy to compare it with its descendants. Tall hammers and prominent levers can't compete with the sleek, balanced hammerless game gun - though many a graceful design feature of the perfected Edwardian double gun made its start in the pinfire, such as top- and side-levers. I prefer to appreciate the quality of their construction, and their ingenuity. As the OP said, there are some gorgeous ones that appear on the market from time to time. While I have gone the route of loading reusable brass cases in the past, it is a tricky business to get the pressures just right, and I was never completely satisfied. Even pinfires that have not been 'shot out' have likely seen more shells than I can realistically imagine, and 'obsolete' guns are never carefully looked after. 160 or more years of inattentive storage is not a good starting point for testing gun barrels, and I have chosen to retire all of my pinfires from active shooting. Should someone start manufacturing consistent-quality black-powder pinfire shells I might reconsider, but I'm not expecting that to happen anytime soon. Are they worth the trouble? For shooting I would definitely look elsewhere, but for sheer enjoyment of the Victorian gunmaker's art, there is no finer gun to own.  Wow. That is an incredibily beautiful gun. Thank you Steve for sharing that with us, and for the advice. I have a hard enough time fiddling with 2.5" center fire shells for my Lefevers, so I think I'll take your advice.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 978 Likes: 51
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 978 Likes: 51 |
Wow. What a rare find! 40 years and you still haven't shot it? Curiosity would get the best of me. Just curious, anyone know why are the majority of pinfires are cylinder choked?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
Mark;
I can't say for certain, but I think the reason most re cylinder is just a matter of their time frame. As has been pointed out the pin-fire system was relatively short-lived & most were made before choke boring was fully developed & in general use.
According to Mr Crawford mine was likely built in 1863-65 & it is late for a pin-fire.
Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90 |
Wow. What a rare find! 40 years and you still haven't shot it? Curiosity would get the best of me. Just curious, anyone know why are the majority of pinfires are cylinder choked? Mark, all early pinfires are cylynder-bored because they pre-date the invention of choke-boring, which was first patented around 1866 if Im not mistaken. By the early 1870s choke-boring was widely used, but by then pinfires were obsolete, at least in Britain. You are more likely to find later Continental pinfires with choke-boring. Mind, the clever Victorians found other ways to extend the range of long shots, like wire cages around the pellets in the cartridge... and whether pre-choke barrels were truly cylynder-bored throughout their length is an interesting subject for study!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,159 Likes: 250
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,159 Likes: 250 |
 In the past Pinfire guns here where classed as obsolete but now my County Police are starting to strongly suggest that they need to be entered on your Licence because cartages are now being made and retailed and France was mentioned. A distributer here in Brit land was also mentioned but now no longer stock them because of the high cost. So the constabulary have come up with this gem if you shoot the gun it will have to be entered on your Licence but if you do not intend to shoot the gun it can be kept as a curio and kept under lock and key. The gun in the picture was built by Samuel Ebrall of Shrewsbury. I was lucky when I came across the gun it had a lot of the reloading tools with it. 
The only lessons in my life I truly did learn from where the ones I paid for!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90 |
In the past Pinfire guns here where classed as obsolete but now my County Police are starting to strongly suggest that they need to be entered on your Licence because cartages are now being made and retailed and France was mentioned. A distributer here in Brit land was also mentioned but now no longer stock them because of the high cost. So the constabulary have come up with this jem if you shoot the gun it will have to be entered on your Licence but if you do not intend to shoot the gun it can be kept as a curio and kept under lock and key. The gun in the picture was built by Samuel Ebrall of Shrewsbury. I was lucky when I came across the gun it had a lot of the reloading tools with it. Any cased pinfire is a cause for celebration, better still if it comes with loading tools!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,543 Likes: 456
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,543 Likes: 456 |
Last edited by Argo44; 11/12/19 11:52 PM.
Baluch are not Brahui, Brahui are Baluch
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 452 Likes: 90 |
Argo44, thanks for reminding me. That New Zealand gun is a real beauty, and like all 1850s British pinfires, a rare treasure. I've just rambled at length about these early designs in your Reilly thread, so I won't repeat it here! The original Lefaucheux double-bite fastening system partially raises the barrels when the forward underlever opens fully. This assisted opening would have helped speed up loading and unloading. In the New Zealand Reilly I'm guessing it has the Lang-designed rising stud on the action bar near the face, which moves when the forward underlever is rotated. While a feature of the early single-bite forward-underlever (and some single-bite rearward-underlever) guns, this mechanism was never patented by Lang and it was widely copied.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,531 Likes: 20
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,531 Likes: 20 |
You might take a look at the latest Double Gun Journal. There's an article about an absolutely stunning pinfire toward the end of the magazine. Just looked at the photos so far (I always go through the entire issue looking at pictures before reading the articles), so I can't tell you much more about it.
|
|
|
|
|
