....What is the objection to Class III designation for assault rifles? If you want to keep them, show that you're willing to put a barrier in front of loonies. Otherwise, your position is that you'd prefer to see the continued random slaughter....
Bill, I used to think it was funny that you babble incoherently, but now I suspect there is a deeper, philosophical meaning. Awe never mind, I understand you.
So Bill, please explain what other Constitutional Right that you have preserved for yourself, because you were forced to keep it from loonies? Do you think that just because you're a loonie, and I can't stop you from loonie talk, that the nation should lose freedom of speech?
Why don't you visit one of your recreational shooting ranges on any MT weekend with decent weather, and lecture the informal target shooters that their intent is death. How about those highly competitive and popular precision shooting matches that go all summer out in MT, do you judge the appropriateness of their decisions for long range target shooting? How about the big game hunting season that's just about here, are there going to be any 'AR' style hunting rigs out there? Are you going to stop and have a pleasant tailgate chat with some dad and his boy about the small cow elk they're tickled about, or lecture him on the evils of assault weapons?
I couldn't care less about Cl III firearms discussion, they are a clearly defined category. What I am asking of you, is a '98 Mauser or an '03 Springfield weapons of war that might have a little lipstick on them, or are they in Bill's special exempt from discussion category?
If I took the position that I want random slaughter, what makes you think I can't just say it? What makes you think I've ever even hinted about it. When the thought 'big lie' pops into your head, run over to the mirror and look for a moment before your start pecking on your keyboard, eh?
