Craig, I don't like gender politics. The Democrats speak up for everyone who is marginalized, and that's all to the good....
....On another topic, would you like your SS account to be managed by Wall Street? Is there ANY current Republican policy you have the slightest concern about?
I left out the middle part because keith made relevant and important points. You could consider giving him the courtesy of a measured and factual response. If you reread my comment, I did not portray barak in any way, I pointed out that he was not held responsible for his policies and their results. You do know that keith is correct about dems going ape-shit against your current President, but no one ever meaningfully could hold your guy to task, wink, because of the identity politics you despise, right?
About, who should be managing social security, all I gather is that you think the fed gov is the best manager of such things. pelosi is now in a twitter feud with three or four radical progressive America last gals. Does she seem like a uniter that can take an American citizen social security package to the senate and bring it to the President to sign? Don't beat around the bush, I believe the dems, and Rs, see it as a dribble of cash for pork. With all the talk of free, free, free can pelosi even put it on the table just to embarrass the insincere Rs? The folks you vote for are way to risky to assign responsibility for anything that requires rules or laws to be followed, period.
And, yes I believe I am engaged in multiple issues, meaning policies, tactics and results. You have never disputed the many times that I have mentioned that an R will protect you right to be you, but a dem will never be satisfied with their unilateral nondemocratic reaches for control over you. You have an amazing but sad luxury to push facts out of your sight and mind. I never said the Rs are perfect, but the dems proposed policies are an absolute mess, and if you have an ounce of honesty, you'd admit that barry has nearly nothing to show for eight years leading the country, he has a legacy of feelings, opinions and some vague concept of pushing the social justice needle farther along than hill ever could.
So, dems speak up for folks that're marginalized. Too funny, we were 'talking' about gender politics. Women are not marginalized, yet you feel it's all to the good to propagate a wedge issue that was fabricated by progressives. Please don't patronize me about your likes and dislikes, you have told me how you vote, pro gender politics. If you don't like it, don't vote for them. Not only that, if you can't factually and objectively respond to questions about the failures of progressive policy, then stop voting to perpetuate them. The words you type are always fun to play games with, the claims of who you vote for that want to change my country and my family's future on their whim are, well....a serious problem, eh?
I look forward your discission about factual policy results for factual problems that will be address by the eventual dem candidate that you will be voting for, okay?
