King, I didn't edit out Ed's words where he said it was time for us to disarm. But you did. Why did you leave out the juicy part?


Originally Posted By: ed good
... it is long past time to do as the rest of the civilized world has done and simply, disarm...


It has long been illegal for "super-dangerous" criminals to own guns and use them to commit violent crimes. There is no tolerance for that sort of thing here, nor is there a tolerance for mass murder.... except from Liberal Left Democrats who wish to restore to convicted felons the right to vote. I'll bet you are all in favor of that.

Ed has also called for blanket bans on an entire class of legal firearms, and you have seen that too, because I have re-posted his QUOTES on that a multitude of times. Ditto for Ed's calls to restrict and ban certain magazines which he (and you) finds unacceptable.

Originally Posted By: ed good
if society, via our law makers, deem it necessary to restrict or prohibit our possession of certain classes of arms, then every good citizen should obey the law for the good of the majority.

and if some here wish to discuss further restriction and prohibition of certain classes of arms here, then why not?


And look King... here's Ed once again... using just the words you chose to edit out:

Originally Posted By: ed good
guess no body here has the balls to answer my question:


disarm...seems to work for the rest of the civilized world...

why not us?


But like you King, Ed has a long history of being in denial about the 2nd Amendment:

Originally Posted By: ed good
next question:

does the second amendment prohibit state and local governments from regulating the keeping of arms by the people?

i believe it does not...what say you?


There's lots more here for anyone who might actually still believe you are capable of telling the truth:

ANTI-GUN POSTS by ED GOOD

Your claim to have never seen any anti-gun sentiment in all your years here is not just a matter of being unable to see them, as some have been unable to discern tiny cracks. Your claim is dishonest... and it took creative editing on your part to attempt to get us to simply forget the most important part of the QUOTE I posted as an example of Ed's anti-gun sentiment and beliefs. Is that how you operated as a reporter?

Dishonesty is not civility. But this latest "craft of journalism" and dishonest spin will certainly help to cement your legacy here as an anti-2nd Amendment Troll.


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug