Some thoughts I had when I decided to see if I could win it.
1. I agree with Mike about the owner doing the work, but only as it pertains to the checkering and engraving. I also agree, way over the top, amateurish and inconsistent in layout. I still haven't figured out the engraving/punch work.
2. There is what looks like a nicely done 3 panel checkering job on the bolt, I don't think the same person did that or the jeweling.
3. I believe the barrel was turned to a light profile removing the original caliber markings and they were relocated. Thoughts on this?
4. Looks like a G&H front sight to go along with the other metal work.
5. I agree about the Williams sight, but the inletting for the Lyman looks good as does what I can see of the rest of it.
6. I too believe the G&H base replaced a larger side mount. That might explain the standard screw appearance. This is a 1932 rifle and I don't know when the flush screws became the "norm" but it could be a later replacement for an earlier scope setup as was the Williams for the Lyman.
For what it's worth, I think this might have been a nicely executed rifle that received some replacement parts (scope and peep) and then was subjected to "embellishment" by it's owner or a subsequent owner. I can see it being passed on to a younger generation who thought they could make it "look better" but totally lacked the skills to do this, that is the voice of experience speaking.
Winchester 54, 250 Savage, Lyman Alaskan & G&H mount decent stock design added up to something I felt had potential. My 250s consist of a pair of Savage 1920s and a 99 so this would have complimented them. Sometimes ugly has hidden beauty and I thought I saw that in this rifle. As it is, I'm sorry I didn't get it, but glad I have the $$ for something else.
