S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
9 members (Mt Al, FlyChamps, graybeardtmm3, HalfaDouble, DropLockBob, Karl Graebner, 2 invisible),
501
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,489
Posts561,990
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
Looking at 12 gauge constrictions from this Ithaca chart; full (4) = .036", IM (3) = .027", Mod (2) = .018", IC (1) = .009" & Cyl = 0.000 (0) Note the numbers in parenthesis are the old Ithaca numerical choke markings.
Doesn't look that much different to Browning Specs to me & again the IC choke is equal to British & Continental ¼ choke. There, these chokes would be called Full, 3/4, ½, ¼ & Cyl. Note that 3/4 of .036 = .027, ½ of .036 = .018 & ¼ of .036 = .009 which matches exactly with the listed choke diameters. IC other than in the US generally meant from 003" to .006" of constriction. It was meant to improve the performance of a cylinder bore without materially reducing its spread, just help even out the pattern. It was a great improvement with the old card & felt wadding of the day.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
gil russell
|
11/23/18 01:45 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Tom C
|
11/23/18 01:49 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Boats
|
11/23/18 02:01 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Perry M. Kissam
|
11/23/18 03:06 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
gil russell
|
11/23/18 03:22 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Ithaca5E
|
11/23/18 03:43 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
2-piper
|
11/23/18 04:24 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Boats
|
11/23/18 06:58 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
L. Brown
|
11/23/18 11:31 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Researcher
|
11/24/18 02:29 AM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
2-piper
|
11/24/18 04:21 AM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Chuck H
|
11/27/18 02:52 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Stanton Hillis
|
11/28/18 12:03 AM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Chuck H
|
11/28/18 11:17 AM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Stanton Hillis
|
11/28/18 11:57 AM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
canvasback
|
11/28/18 01:21 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Chukarman
|
11/28/18 10:19 PM
|
Re: Chokes by label--full,mod, etc vs constriction
|
Stanton Hillis
|
11/29/18 01:27 AM
|
|
|
|