|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (Hammergun, KDGJ, SKB, battle, 2 invisible),
2,720
guests, and
13
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,335
Posts574,008
Members14,700
| |
Most Online32,084 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19 |
Can any one tell me whats going on here? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226 |
http://www.shotguns.se/html/uk.htmlBirmingham 12 gauge 2 1/2 inch chambers Choked bores Has been reproofed (Crown R) Reproof date 1992 (Crossed swords TC1) Has original date code and reproof date code 850 Bar is the proof pressure
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19 |
What would the 18-1 and 18-7 represent? And the 14 and 1?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
The 18.1 & 18.7 are bore diameters in mm. Although very faint it appears to me the 1? is also a 14. This would have been the gauge of the bores at original proof. 14 gauge = to .693" 14/1 would have been .701" so the bore would have been between those two dimensions when proofed. Obviously, the 18.1 bore has been enlarged a bit & the 18.7 one a great amount. They were, however, re-proofed as enlarged.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19 |
Interesting, its on a 12ga Tolley, do you think they made a 14ga?
Last edited by RARiddell; 11/22/18 12:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 119
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 119 |
Only the left tube had choke originally. Right would have been cylinder. 18.1mm = .7125" 18.7mm = .736"
Hard to imagine it was a 14 bore originally! I would check the wall thickness in the left tube.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 790 Likes: 47
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 790 Likes: 47 |
Skeetx: Yes, I can see the reproof code front of left barrel flat but where are seeing the original proof code? There were no Birmingham proof codes until the 1920's and London didn't introduce them until 1972. Are you mistaking the Birmingham View and Definitive proof marks for date code stamps? These were discontinued in 1904, the Diamond with the nominal Chamber size introduced in 1887 so the best you are going to get from the original proof marks is 1887-1904. I see quite a few old 12b shotguns with tubes proofed at 14. These tend to be at the cheaper end of the quality range but that is not a hard rule. I have always assumed that this may have been a way of saving a few pennies: one can use a smaller tube blank if one bores a smaller hole up it AND get good thick walls. Probably a majority of the Birmingham gun trade were producing guns down to a price, not up to a standard, so every penny counted.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226 |
There are proof codes before the 1920s There are no date codes before the 1920s
I do agree with you that this gun was made way before the 1920s
The BNP Crown has been used since 1954 and I think the entire proof stings was added at reproof.
There are three proof date codes, I can only read one at this time
Mike
Last edited by skeettx; 11/22/18 03:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,134 Likes: 19 |
Right, and based on what Miller had mentioned I was making the assumption it had been honed (they are damascus) and reproofed at the larger 18.1 and 18.7mm diameters, so the 14/1 was a bit of a mystery.
Last edited by RARiddell; 11/22/18 03:59 PM.
|
|
|
|
|