S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (Carcano),
704
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,490
Posts562,010
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
Better take a dive in the Holy water Doc...
When I asked if you had any damascus barreled guns you replied "no"...I got a pretty good memory if you had said I sold them to finance a mission trip I wouldn't have forgotten that..
The only reason I asked then was because your keen interest seemed suspect to me.
Maybe you sold them or maybe you had them in a previous life....don't make no never mind to me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460 |
jOe - you've lied about me once, and then called me a liar twice. I'm going to chose to let this one...lay. Your discernment regarding my motivation is incorrect. Keith - think about some new material. Your insults were once at least entertaining; they are now repetitive, boring and increasingly difficult to follow. When you google "projection" check out "looseness of association" also. and your new friend Dave has been at this awhile, using several, including his actual, names https://shootingsportsman.com/community/guns-ammunition/sharing-l-c-smith-information/ http://gundogforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=31578
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673 |
What's so hard to follow Drew? You have lied, and you have been intentionally deceptive. I've backed up my assertions with your own words and deeds, and you have come back with your weak lame response that my posts are boring and repetitive. Not that I'd really expect someone like you to honor the terms of your challenge. Dave is not my friend, but you persist in that lie too. He did not post his full name here, and what he did anywhere else does not give you the right to post his name here. Stop making childish excuses. Now we have you calling jOe a liar too. I know which one of you I believe is telling the truth. Since you were apparently able to understand me the first time I posted it on 7/5/2018, I will repeat my exact words I used to reply to you then concerning your lies and hypocrisy: Here's the problem Keith. "You will learn that here on the internet, you can pretend to be whatever you want to be" only applies to those who cowardly hide behind internet anonymity. Those with the cojones to reveal their identiy, like Larry, and Michael, and Greg, and King, and many others here, EVEN ed, don't have that choice, and likely are more careful with their words, and insults. Please save us the smart azz come back claiming to be someone you are not. Sorta sounds like jaeger doesn't it? Or whining about being personally attacked. Or JamesM delusional paranoia that you are being threaten. And BTW: those who continually insult other adult males suggesting they are behaving like women, or are F.A.G.s, frequently have some gender identity conflict with self-loathing projection. P.S. You can find my home phone and address at the bottom here. I can't hide like you, and I am neither a liar nor a coward http://www.picturetrail.com/homePage/gracemedicalmissions
I suppose I could have given Drew the last word here, but there is so much unadulterated bullshit in this one short post that it screams for a reply.
Drew, you said, ""Please save us the smart azz come back claiming to be someone you are not."
Drew, please show us exactly where I have ever claimed to be something I'm not.
Drew, you are once again going on about your moral superiority for posting under your full name. For years, you posted under a screen name, as do most intelligent gun collectors. Many here besides myself still do. You made the stupid choice to change, and now wish to belittle anyone who isn't as dumb. If any thieves or crackheads ever decide to make a home invasion attack on your premises because you are stupid enough to post your interest and collecting of guns under your full name, I hope you are home alone. I believe you have endangered your family in your vain attempt at moral superiority.
You make a good point about posting under our full names, but once again shoot down your own argument, just as you did in your heart-wrenching "Down One" thread back in 2016.
Drew's Heart Wrenching Personal Attack "Down One" thread
I still laugh when I think about that thread Drew. You framed it around some deadly dangerous medical mission trip to Guatemala, and spoke about the horrible spiritual warfare you were enduring as you mentally prepared for it. You made it sound like God was calling Moses when you told us about the "eternal significance" of your personal attack on JamesM, Dave K., and me.
As it turned out, your big dangerous Medical Mission trip to Guatemala turned out to be about a 4 1/2 day trip... little more than a long weekend. Take out travel time, and it looks like little more than a fund raising tax shelter to me. But that's just my opinion. Now my neighbor went on a Religious Mission trip last year and spent two months helping African natives. And he never bragged about it or used it as a framework for personal attacks. I hope you get a nice income tax break for your grueling ministry. But other than that short absence, you never really left this forum, as you had disingenuously stated. You were logged in virtually every day to read your thread and to see who was fawning over you, and sympathetic to you. That's pathetic.
Up until that time, your Tag Line at the bottom of every post was: [b]"Personal attacks only reflect the inadequacy of the argument, and the character of the attacker." I repeatedly asked you about the hypocrisy of making a personal attack on us while you used that Tag Line. You couldn't give us an answer, and instead, you changed your Tag Line. Smooth move there Reverend.
You made the plaintive argument that by posting under our full names, we would be more civilized, and less likely to launch into personal attacks. But just as you did in this idiotic post, you shot yourself in the foot by making a personal attack on JamesM. You know Jim personally. You know his full name. You hunted with him and socialized with him and his wife. Yet that didn't stop you from making your personal attacks on him, right up to the time he left this forum.
jOe realized that this is another hypocritical personal attack by you, and he also saw right through that filthy lie about Jim:
An attack by a preacher whats the world coming to ?
Ps...James gave up on this place because of the socialist liberals that are allowed to run rampant on here.
But you had also made personal attacks on Run With The Fox even though you knew his name and where he lived. Your Bro Larry made personal attacks on Francis even though he knew he was a combat veteran. No complaints or whining from crybaby Gregory about that personal attack on a military veteran. Go figure.
I repeatedly asked you about the personal attacks you were making then, while you made your disingenuous case for posting under full names. You never replied. You also made the false and dishonest statement that I had "Proof texted Scripture." I repeatedly asked you where I did that, and again, you couldn't reply or show us without admitting that it was another falsehood from the Preacher.
It wasn't enough that you and your fellow Liberal F.A.G.'s succeeded in driving Jim (JamesM) away. You still continue your personal attacks on him even now... even though you know his full name. Worse yet, you are resorting to lies to denigrate him by accusing him of delusional paranoia. Jim specifically told us why he became disgusted with this place. jOe remembers why, as do lots of other guys. But that didn't stop you from accusing him of "delusional paranoia". It seems that your personal attacks on Jim are continuing even when he isn't here to defend himself. Now do you see why you are called Fake Ass Gentlemen?
That sounded a lot like another time when Jim took a break from posting, and your Libtard pal King Brown kept lying by saying Jim had exhorted us to kill his one of his anti-gun Liberal Left heroes, George Soros, and lied even further by saying that Jim had contacted Connecticut police about Newtown and that he was under "emotional strain."
King was asked to prove those false statements and personal attacks, but was predictably silent, choosing to fade away and change the subject. That's why I almost choked when you listed him among the virtuous and righteous ones who post under their full name. King has shown me that he is perhaps the single most dishonest guy to ever post here. He has been shown to flat out lie and post false data on many many occasions to advance his Liberal Left anti-2nd Amendment and Socialist dogma. Hell, the guy can even deny ever seeing any anti-gun sentiment posted here, even when his lying nose is shoved into a quote from Ed Good saying that the U.S. has too many dangerous guns and it is time to disarm.
I also got a kick out of you attempting to twist my words once again, and sneaking in another personal attack in the process. It was very dishonest of you to attempt to suggest I have some gender identity conflict by comparing guys who pretend to IGNORE me to a menstruating woman. That is exactly what they act like. But you went further to twist the acronym F.A.G.s into something else. Each time I used that acronym in this thread, I followed it with (Fake Ass Gentlemen). I then went on to specifically explain it, and its' origin, to dhanks. But fraud that you are, you still had to twist it to suggest that I might have gender identity issues. What a stand-up guy you are Drew! Actually, I think that may be your problem since you feel the need to repeatedly tell us about your "cajones", and the acronym F.A.G.'s seems to really hit a nerve in you. Do you take it personally when you see a Doughboy in an old movie about WWI referring to a cigarette as a fag?
Then you go on by once again telling us that you are not a coward, and that I can look you up and even call your phone number. You told us that you aren't a liar, but you've shown us otherwise. Is the notice that I can call you and find you some weak testosterone laden call-out? Do you want me to call you and threaten you? What exactly are you trying to prove?
During your fake "Down One" absence, I received a PM from a member here that you consider one of your "Bro's". I still have it. He told me that he'd like to see you return to the forum, but was concerned that I'd launch an attack on you. I assured him that I would do no such thing unless you personally attacked me. After my reply to him, you returned within minutes, so I assume he relayed my words to you. Since that time, I've specifically avoided conflict with you. We recently sparred a bit over my belief that SSRI drugs may be a contributing factor to mass shootings, but it remained quite civil. But now it looks as if you'd like to resume your disingenuous and dishonest personal attacks. As you wish. At least you won't have to worry about getting criticized by your fellow F.A.G.'s and Thread Police. They likely won't be squealing to Dave calling for censorship either.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673 |
And as TV Pitch Man Ron Popeil used to say... "Wait, there's more!" Here's your reply to that post of mine from 7/5/18 Drew... along with my response to you. You win Keith. We both have claimed to be a follower of Jesus, and it is possible my words, like yours, have brought reproach to His name. For that I'm sorry. Please consider those of St. Ambrose of Milan “No one heals himself by wounding another.”
[b]"We both have claimed to be a follower of Jesus, and it is possible my words, like yours, have brought reproach to His name."And now Drew says that it is possible my words here have brought reproach to the name of Jesus! Really??? One might think he would have considered those words of St Ambrose himself, before launching another personal attack on JamesM and myself.
This guy never quits. But as I said... here on the internet, you can be whatever you want to be... even a Bible quoting man of the cloth... until you get tripped up by your own words and deeds.
Just ask Jagermeister, and the Award Winning Wine-Maker King, and the brilliant guy who gets his tag-line from a coffee mug.
By the way, in response to Drew's edit... I do indeed have knowledge of your PM exchange with Jim, and I did see your personal attacks on Francis... the kind of personal attacks you preach about, and the kind you claim wouldn't ever happen if we posted under our full names. I am not interested in the number of Mission trips you have made to Central America. They have nothing to do with the subject of double guns, as you and the Thread Police continually whine about here, when someone makes an off-topic post you don't like. The points I made about how you framed your 2016 trip to Guatemala, and your use of it to launch personal attacks, and to pretend you left this forum when you were logged in here virtually every day are still valid. My opinions have not changed a bit. Too bad you couldn't use your editing time to show us how I brought reproach to the name of Jesus.
I am a sinner. But my big sin here is my inability to turn the other cheek when attacked by frauds and hypocrites.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673 |
Hey jOe, did ya see that the preacher started a new "Shooting Damascus Barrels Part II" thread to inform us that he is not a liar? I guess he doesn't wish to respond to the ones I caught him in above. You didn't really apologize to him like he said you did, so in my opinion, that's nothing more than another lie. This is getting so weird. I wonder why he seems to be trying to transfer his disingenuous behavior onto you and me? That doesn't seem to be a very civil, mannerly, or Christian thing to do.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
Doc you really surprise me digging up all this evidence of your tall tales.
I thought it well established who the liar was...and it's not me.
|
|
|
|
|