King Brown isn't struggling against the latest threat against Canadian gun owners. He and his kind... Liberal Left Anti-Gun Socialists... are the exact cause of this threat against law abiding gun owners.
King has spent his entire life supporting and defending those who infringe upon gun ownership rights, both here, and in Canada.
If this was almost anyone else, I might pause and think perhaps he had an epiphany that changed his heart. But I believe this is simply his panicked response to the idea that the majority here finally realize that he is nothing but a termite that has been quietly eating away at the structure of our 2nd Amendment. Where was this sentiment for the last 15 years when he said the things I previously quoted? Where was his support for politicians and judges who would preserve, protect, and defend our Constitutional Right?
This old Fraud asks, (paraphrasing for brevity) "Where is canvasback... where is oldstarfire... where are other Canadian gun owners during this latest attack on gun owners?" He beats his chest and acts like he is the shining beacon of hope for Canadian gun owners.
Well, they are exactly where they were during the fight to eliminate the Long Gun Registry... fighting on their home turf. They did not air that out here, although they mentioned it when they repeatedly warned us to not permit our lawmakers to take us down the same path. James (canvasback) and oldstarfire have been reliable supporters gun rights both at home in Canada, and here. They have been like the canary in the coal mine for years, and it's embarrassing to say they have been a stronger voice for the 2nd Amendment than most U.S. gun owners.
For King to now question canvasback and oldstarfire's commitment to gun rights shows just how low he will go to try to dishonestly reverse the anti-gun legacy he has created for himself.
The question in everyone's mind should be, where was King Brown when oldstarfire and canvasback and other Canadians were warning us what would happen if we allowed the type of politician King supports to be elected. The answer: King was lying to us and LULLING us and telling us we had nothing to worry about.
Here's a direct unedited QUOTE from King Brown. In it, he once again makes the Anti-Gunner's claim that the Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms was invented or changed by the Supreme Court in 2008. And he lies to us and says Obama did nothing but talk about more gun control when he knows damn well his attempt to restrict guns, ammunition, and large cap magazines was his most stinging defeat:
The Court in 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller changed the 200-year-old narrowly interpreted Second from serving in the militia to an individual right. Do you favour democratic processes over justice of stacked courts?
Why I ask, as I mentioned earlier, is that there is no political will to change regulations; Obama talked about it but did nothing. What party would commit suicide by taking away what a majority considers a sacred right?
Either King is lying to us here, or he is mentally ill. Or both.
