Larry;You Hit the nail on the head with that last post, Every thing you have given us is Speculation. There is absolutely no Solid evidence to base any conclusions on.
You Win Larry, there is absolutely no point in continuing when you will say one thing at one point & Then Lie about saying it & take another tack, You have not Really proven this test ever even took place.
I have only your word & Thomas' word & both appear to talk out of both sides of your mouth & say different things on different occasions.
I will ask one more time, WHAT did the accelerometer reveal, In What way did it prove that fast powder had less recoil.??
Nope, not all speculation. We don't need to "speculate" about what Thomas wrote, because I quoted him directly from his book. You're the one doing the speculating and asking questions that I already told you--multiple times-- that I can't answer. Concerning the tests: I ONLY KNOW WHAT HE WROTE. NOTHING MORE. You don't seem to be able to comprehend that.
Thomas doesn't tell us what the accelerometers revealed, so how could I possibly tell you? Read his last sentence concerning the "proof" that fast powder recoils less than slow powder. Did you miss the part about it being the unanimous verdict of the shooters?
So you have nothing new to contribute but speculation . . . including speculation that maybe the tests didn't even take place. Well, when I lived in Morocco--not long after the moon landings--I ran into many people who couldn't believe that it happened. And there are still some skeptics running around today. I held a moon rock in my hand, courtesy of astronaut Michael Collins' sister. From all I knew, it might've come from her back yard. Evidence can certainly be faked. But I believed it was a real moon rock. So yeah, I believe the tests took place. Beyond that, unless someone comes up with other information I haven't seen, we only know what Thomas wrote about them.
