The obvious question is why would a man like Will, who believes in limited government, not just fail to like Trump, but revile him in every way possible?....
....The Republican Party no longer stands for a rugged individualism; that's history. Nowadays, what it promotes are the following: to deny and ignore climate science in favor of fossil fuels, to cut taxes for the rich, to let corporations do whatever they please, to loose protections for air, water, soil, public lands, and consumers,to reduce access to health care, to gut the social safety net, to reduce investment in infrastructure and education, and to increase military spending. Other than these minor details, what's not to like?
Will is exactly like you Bill, when you revile someone, all your years of experience say is that your emotions are more important than the issues or the facts. It's a double win for you, you found a kindred spirit and you feel like your talking points have been parroted. What value does his resume and analysis have if it's nothing more than agenda driven opinion? Heck, you can read that stuff on the internet.
I'm sorry that your President causes you to, not just dislike him, but revile him. Perhaps a comfort goat or a cry room would make you feel better? You should look for common ground, who else would try to reign in big corporate abortion mills that do whatever they feel like doing? Maybe, he'll try to reign in free for all gender reassignment, so that real Americans can get a few more crumbs of actual heath care.
Maybe, your President doesn't like those commercials that reveal one in ten Montanans have been lured and trapped into chemical dependency by the dems? Weren't you the fellow singing the praises of importing kali attitudes and money into Montana. Nothing says rugged individualism like a mega rich techie posting 'his' land, and complaining about the service at the all important tofu shop, eh? Ooops, since you revile your President, you don't care, eh?
Talk about minor details, Bill, did you forget all the talking point 'ists'?
