June
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Who's Online Now
4 members (Gunning Bird, 3 invisible), 268 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,578
Posts546,598
Members14,424
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 93
battle Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 93
New pic


,

Last edited by battle; 03/24/18 06:39 PM.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 170
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 170
Sure looks like a re-proof

to 2 3/4 " cartridges
and 3 1/4 tons per square "

Mike


USAF RET 1971-95 [Linked Image from jpgbox.com]
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 16
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 16
Birmingham nitro proofs. Does look a little strange, but I have limited experience looking at reproofs. The Birmingham proof house could tell you definitively whether these proofs were done by them. Send a clear photo and ask them?


C Man
Life is short
Quit your job.
Turn off the TV.
Go outside and play.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 778
Likes: 36
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 778
Likes: 36
Sorry battle, but I am still unsure about these marks. The '1/4' that follows the '3' overlaps with the 'tons' in a most unusual way and the '3' looks rather different (and fresher) than the 'tons...'.
Also the '1/2' of '2 1/2' has been overstamped with the '3/4', again most unusual for this to be done when there is plenty of space to put in a fresh '2 3/4"'mark.
The date stamp is unclear but appears to be in the range of 1950 to 1974, left letter might be an S which would be for 1967. The Imperial bore measurement was introduced in 1954 along with 'tons per [square]"' mark.
Quite correct that the reproof 'R' was sometimes missed off but by this date it was the exception rather than the rule.
I have to say I think the marks are suspect at best.
As Chukarman says above, only Birmingham Proof House could confirm one way or the other. Phone them, they are quite helpful.

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 91
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 91
Never mind the proof marks .I would worry about the rest of the gun form the batted look of the lumps in the photo .

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.059s Queries: 26 (0.039s) Memory: 0.8119 MB (Peak: 1.9001 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-04 19:09:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS