|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (shrapnel, Geoff Roznak, Stanton Hillis, dukxdog, Ryan McNabb, Argo44),
1,213
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,318
Posts573,754
Members14,690
| |
Most Online32,084
Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,045 Likes: 139
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,045 Likes: 139 |
Thanks Stan. I just read on trapshooter.com that Rackley can convert a Perazzi or Giuliani trigger to mechanical. Only advantage I would really see would be for sub gauge, especially the .410. Having said that, I do like the wonderful Krieghoff mechanical trigger even for the 12 ga.
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,635 Likes: 2390
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,635 Likes: 2390 |
A mechanical would be an advantage if you were using sub gauge tubes, I guess. I shoot different guns in sub gauge, so don't need that.
Don is one of the nicest people I have ever dealt with. A true gentleman.
SRH
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,321 Likes: 32
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,321 Likes: 32 |
At different times I was told by Giacomo and Lucio both to avoid Perazzi triggers converted to mechanical. They both seemed to consider the basic design not amenable to that conversion. The two mechanical triggers I've seen did not impress me. The gold thing may be different, I don't know. Perazzi has available a number of different weight inertia blocks and they can be installed to accommodate the lightest loads.
Dr.WtS
Mysteries of the Cosmos Unlocked
available by subscription
Facisti Va Fan Culo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
