S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,490
Posts562,006
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,243 Likes: 423
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,243 Likes: 423 |
Don't be too harsh on people that accumulate. There is only so much time, and we do things other than shoot. So, safes fill, guns are seldom shot, and a few favorites see most of the action. Oh weLL.
Guns are like land, if you want to control their destiny, you have to own them.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
Eightbore,
I whole heartedly agree with you. It only takes about 3 pages and the topic is off placed by those who should have been banned years ago. I really don't know what Dave thinks or wants from this forum. It is most difficult to have a good discussion on any topic regarding double guns. And it really is disheartening. Maybe Dave believes in freedom of speech. Controlling speech is worse than gun control. Trying to stifle speech or a point of view on something is pretty liberal... yOu one of them liberals Mr. Tamid ? PS...I read a couple of the posts on page one then I jumped to the last page because to me it was lame and uninteresting...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84 |
Sounds like rational capitalism to me.
Sorta like military intelligence. See if I can drag Larry into this to explain it. Well, when I was in Morocco back in ‘43... _____________________ Hey jOe. Jimmie Hendrix
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,196 Likes: 53
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,196 Likes: 53 |
Yes but it's my dream. Hardly yours to comment on.
Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
Every thread and member drifts from time to time, common on other websites, particularly if a post solicits or provokes a response or is misunderstood. More annoying than harmless banter is name-calling, rudeness, peevishness and imputing motives where none is intended. Bill and Michael saw political in my response to a member's notion of elites. While nearly everything is political, one way or another, my post was simply another notion of elites and civic responsibility.
In the same way, a couple days ago, I contributed to a discussion among Alaska pilots about strategies to oppose a looming top-down, poorly consultated tax that will militate against public and private services throughout the state:
“Listening from the other side of the continent, George's approach appeals to me. Resisting unwarranted bureaucratic and technological interference in public affairs is my day job. Aviation is a major part of your economy, Alaska wouldn't be viable without it. Whoever said all public services should pay their way. That's not how our countries were built in the public interest, which is what people would choose if they saw clearly, thought rationally and acted disinterestedly.
“What I think you're leaving out is the fight. It's not the size of the dog in a fight, it's the fight in the dog. Or, as Stalin said when the pope's name came up at Yalta when the Allies were divvying up the spoils, "How many divisions has the pope?" The key to fairer public policy is organizing, making alliances, collaboration and cooperation. Petitions, private letters to the big bugs hasn't cut much ice in my experience.
“Another often overlooked strategy is providing public managers with ideas and options along with an industry-wide consensus. The organization of which I'm president was able to make our Province abdicate all its private lands responsibilities to our association, arguably the most radical institutional change on the continent. There's enough good ideas and energy above to perhaps make your protest a part of a general regulatory overhaul. Think big.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 341
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 341 |
Elites are decidedly different than Elitists. Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84 |
Every thread and member drifts from time to time, common on other websites, particularly if a post solicits or provokes a response or is misunderstood. More annoying than harmless banter is name-calling, rudeness, peevishness and imputing motives where none is intended. Bill and Michael saw political in my response to a member's notion of elites. While nearly everything is political, one way or another, my post was simply another notion of elites and civic responsibility.
In the same way, a couple days ago, I contributed to a discussion among Alaska pilots about strategies to oppose a looming top-down, poorly consultated tax that will militate against public and private services throughout the state:
“Listening from the other side of the continent, George's approach appeals to me. Resisting unwarranted bureaucratic and technological interference in public affairs is my day job. Aviation is a major part of your economy, Alaska wouldn't be viable without it. Whoever said all public services should pay their way. That's not how our countries were built in the public interest, which is what people would choose if they saw clearly, thought rationally and acted disinterestedly.
“What I think you're leaving out is the fight. It's not the size of the dog in a fight, it's the fight in the dog. Or, as Stalin said when the pope's name came up at Yalta when the Allies were divvying up the spoils, "How many divisions has the pope?" The key to fairer public policy is organizing, making alliances, collaboration and cooperation. Petitions, private letters to the big bugs hasn't cut much ice in my experience.
“Another often overlooked strategy is providing public managers with ideas and options along with an industry-wide consensus. The organization of which I'm president was able to make our Province abdicate all its private lands responsibilities to our association, arguably the most radical institutional change on the continent. There's enough good ideas and energy above to perhaps make your protest a part of a general regulatory overhaul. Think big.”
King Brown. Saving the world one province and state at a time since 1943. Tamid is likely having a case of the fantods after that diversion. _________________________ He’s your countryman Tamid.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,522 Likes: 84 |
Elites are decidedly different than Elitists. Mike I think it was Stalin who said if a few elites get caught up in the elitist hang fest so be it. _______________________ A small price for progress.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 971 Likes: 41
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 971 Likes: 41 |
" I don’t think too many pristine collector guns would stay very pristine for long with all you guys handling and firing those guns, as you suggest. Give us a break, man."
So much the better, so people can see what will happen to each type of shotgun when used. Nothing was said about pristine collectors' guns being used in such a set up. According to collector legend a pair of Boss guns fired over a million rounds at the Eley factory without showing any wear.
Give you a break from what? Giving the buying public the means to judge those hallowed names sounds like good marketing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125 |
Re the elitist thing.
Hoarding has an effect on prices. Many are prevented from owning one good gun because a few accumulate/hoard a whole bunch and prices climb beyond the reach of non elitists.
Guns are parts of a collective industrial culture. Preventing access to those that study it, even enjoy it, without owning is probably a lot more elitist than what Gough Thomas had implied.
Access can be the relatively cost free act of posting (anonymously for the security conscious) photos of those hallowed collections, and there is not much of that going on. Oh, you didn’t say the above about “hallowed collections”? That statement would suggest you are at minimum including collector pieces. I don’t see where you only indicated the Cracker Barrel fireplace guns as the only guns to be included (and Cracker Barrel will let you photo their fireplace guns, not sure about handling though). So, yeah give us a break. PS, and btw, there are museums which display guns, such as the NRA museum. I doubt, however, they will let you handle or fire their collections. Sorry.
Last edited by buzz; 01/26/18 12:01 PM. Reason: PS
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
|