Originally Posted By: Stan
Did Mr. Brister ever (mistakenly) refer to cylinder as choke? I'd be surprised to know that he did.

SRH


I did spot one quote: " . . . pure-cylinder choke (no choke at all) . . . " Expect he did that because some people do refer to cylinder as a choke rather than the absence of choke. But what he put in parentheses cleared up his reference, I think. But it's usually thrown into discussions of choke, or certainly should be. And ends up being included in the general category.

Last edited by L. Brown; 12/21/17 08:29 AM.