|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
6 members (susjwp, dirty harry, SKB, Drew Hause, Lloyd3, 1 invisible),
1,277
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,519
Posts562,291
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 159
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 159 |
Nice. But when I read thumblever I think of Pape' s patent. That is an under lever by my understanding. Am I missing something? Jeremy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127 |
Good observations, all. It is a Purdey and is for sale at Watson Bros. in London. Their website has a few more pictures. I also note that it is marked "choke", which would either mean that the original barrels were jug-choked at a later time or as Dr. Drew proposes, it was rebarreled in the "choke era".
As for the Damascus pattern, I believe you ID'd my 1871 Boss a few weeks ago with the same type of 4-iron Turkish, so perhaps a contemporaneous material corroboration?
Owen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462 |
This is Purdey's "British Best" c. 1873; 3 Iron "Oxford" 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127 |
Dr. Drew, I stand corrected, my contemporaneous Boss was a 3-iron Oxford as in the photo you posted above. I found my buried post/pic and your diagnosis.
As for this Purdey, with likely replacement barrels and black-and-white finish, this Purdey looks like a poseur in the originality department. All the same, somebody buy it please so that I stop visiting that web page!!
Owen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 182
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 182 |
That website is dangerous! I really like their Boswell 8 bore double.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 787 Likes: 45
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 787 Likes: 45 |
Owen, at the risk of being pedantic: it's not a 'thumblever' but (if a Purdey) described as a 'Daw's lever' after the Maker who first patented such a thing. It probably uses the Thumblever internals but if so, its on the 2nd Patent. The 1st has its hinge point much further forward in the bar.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 732 Likes: 127 |
Thanks for the correction, gentleman, of course it has no hole in the trigger guard into which a thumb can be inserted and so it is not a thumb opener. I bet not many Purdeys were made in 16ga with the Daw lever.
Owen
|
|
|
|
|
|