Originally Posted By: Wonko the Sane
Originally Posted By: BrentD
Originally Posted By: Stan
Constriction is the only way to "choke down" the diameter of the shot column, and to work, it has to happen at, or very near the muzzle. This reduction of diameter at the muzzle is what provides the choke effect...... the reduction, regardless of bore diameter.

SRH


yes, I know that and can repeat it, but as a dumb professor, I want to understand the mechanics of WHY constriction, not final diameter matters. I feel this missing mechanism is probably somewhat embedded with the arguments above that I have, admittedly, only skimmed through. There is a difference between knowing and understanding. I'm looking for the latter.


Reeely? Do you have any notion of physics whatsoever? Just what sort of professor are you? Physical sciences and logic seem not to be intrinsic to whatever it is. Not to be mean-spirited or anything but you have to make some effort to understand some basic concepts or just be what looks like a troll. I mean, your statements are inane but wonderfully clever.

just sayin'


I'm the kind of professor that would be quite happy to see you explain this in partial differential equations if you would. I can handle the physics just fine too, but you have yet to say anything that is helpful at explaining the differences between the two hypothetical bores. I take it from your tone, you either cannot do it or, at least, are not interested. Just say so. I can find something else to do with my time that will save you the trouble of the insults.

_________
BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
=>/

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]