October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
3 members (Longknife, Ted Schefelbein, 1 invisible), 677 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,540
Posts562,551
Members14,592
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 461
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 461
Originally Posted By: Shotgunjones
A Cheddite plastic case measures .025" of work hardened plastic.

It might hold 3 BAR. Let's say it will hold 10 BAR (145 PSI).

At a working pressure of 800 BAR, that is (at the very maximum) a percent and a half.

That's lost in the noise of shell to shell variation.

The Earth is an Oblate Spheroid.

Agree 100%. I too thought the notion of a plastic case adding much more than an iota of wall strength very far-fetched.
JR


Be strong, be of good courage.
God bless America, long live the Republic.
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
If you cannot work out that the earth is flat, how can you work this out ?
O.M

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
You are right. The earth is an oblate spheroid. I apologize.
Your analysis of the strength of a plastic shot shell is not germane. At 10 BAR it probably would blow out the primer or swell up and split. Inside a gun chamber it will act very differently. An early sign of excessive pressure is a flattened primer. Meaning that the normal primer was retaining it's shape under, let's say 800 BAR. That same primer it it weren't backed up by the breech face would blow out to hell and gone. The same analogy will hold for the case. The only way to test exactly how much hoop strength a case provides is to get two identical single barrel shotguns. Using a standard case in one increase the charge until you get a dimencial change. Now in the other gun, using similar cases but having 1/3 of their circumference removed lengthwise follow the same procedure. I believe there would a significant difference in results. Do you say the difference would only amount to 10 BAR?

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
I think it would be zero.

The case is ironed by pressure to the chamber walls.

It can't add any hoop strength before the chamber yields because of it's elasticity.

A brass case flows under pressure, you can't tell me it adds any strength to the system.

Yours is the first assertion of this alleged phenomoneon I can recall.


"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Originally Posted By: Shotgunjones
I think it would be zero.

The case is ironed by pressure to the chamber walls.

It can't add any hoop strength before the chamber yields because of it's elasticity.

A brass case flows under pressure, you can't tell me it adds any strength to the system.

Yours is the first assertion of this alleged phenomoneon I can recall.

The first assertion is true, so what?
The second, steel is also elastic, so what?
The third, where to begin. Because brass flows under pressure it can't add any strength to the system, really? Do you really think that?
Let's put all that aside for a bit and look at what will happen in two identical pressure vessels in the following test. One is subjected to increasing but time limited pressure spikes until distortion. The other is subjected to the last pressure on the first before distortion and is held at that pressure. Over time the second vessel will distort too. How quickly this happens depends on the material involved. What revelance does this have to the matter at hand? Only to illustrate the difficulty in testing the effects of pressure in different contexts. Submarines are designed to withstand a pressure from the outside that would blow them apart if applied from the inside. But enough. I can see that nothing I might say would convince you. And rightly so too. If I don't back it up with proof-- well.
By the way, can you prove th Earth is an oblate spheroid?

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
Sure. But it requires a very accurate scale and a good bit of inconvenient and difficult travel.

My Fox Sterlingworth with lengthened chambers AND cones would weigh more at the pole (pick one) than at the equator.

Gravity is inversely proportional to distance you see.

Before we part agreeing to disagree, consider this:

Do you suppose an inner tube ads any strength to the tire?


"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574
Likes: 167
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574
Likes: 167
Hmmm. Going back to the years I worked in a service station and repaired bunches of tires: You can certainly run on a tire with holes if it has an inner tube. But I don't think I'd want to count on the integrity of a shotgun with holes in the chamber walls, counting on the hulls to keep me safe.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 1368
Sidelock
**
Online Content
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 1368
Originally Posted By: Shotgunjones


Before we part agreeing to disagree, consider this:

Do you suppose an inner tube ads any strength to the tire?


What kind of strength? Schwinn actually sold, back in the day, inner tubes that were "thorn resistant".

They were slightly harder to poke a hole in. And less flexible, making the bicycle more work to ride.

It could be argued that the tire/tube assembly, when so equipped was, "stronger" than with the standard tube, could it not?

Best,
Ted

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 4
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 4
Originally Posted By: John Roberts
Originally Posted By: nialmac
Yes of course. What was I thinking of?

British guns and their delicate nature. Elsies don't need no stinking proof.
JR


Yes, but wood cracking at rear of side plates is common problem. It maybe more common than found in old Ithaca 37. Most used field grade LCS guns have them to greater or lesser extent. Looks like JMC has that covered by using light game loads. Don't see much reason to ream out chambers because it isn't going to provide anything in return for effort required to do it.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Originally Posted By: Shotgunjones
Sure. But it requires a very accurate scale and a good bit of inconvenient and difficult travel.

My Fox Sterlingworth with lengthened chambers AND cones would weigh more at the pole (pick one) than at the equator.

Gravity is inversely proportional to distance you see.

Before we part agreeing to disagree, consider this
Do you suppose an inner tube ads any strength to the tire?

If by strength you mean resistance to internal pressure, then of course, if the inner tube wall is uniform and all else being equal, the tire with the tube will withstand more pressure. That's pretty basic engineering. I beginning to think that you are more interested in appearing clever than in the underlying subject of pressure. Furthermore the subject of gravity is far more complex than you seem to think and you could certainly not determine the shape of the planet by your method. Gravity varies all over the surface of the Earth, lots of research on this by the US Navy. This is my absolute last post on this thread. Having worked for the Navy on nuclear subs I'll bet I spent a hell of a lot more time thinking about pressure than you seem to have done. The End.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.289s Queries: 35 (0.221s) Memory: 0.8530 MB (Peak: 1.9014 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-27 13:51:29 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS