S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (buckstix, JHolland),
1,623
guests, and
8
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,527
Posts562,442
Members14,592
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,275 Likes: 460
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,275 Likes: 460 |
I can't begin to imagine how many early American doubles with original short chambers have been reamed to 2 3/4". I don't think removing 3/16" of metal at a very, very shallow angle or degree at the front of the chamber is going to hurt anything on a set L C Smith fluid steel barrels. It will slightly reduce recoil and maybe improve patterns a wee bit. Just shoot reasonable loads and you will be fine. No regrets. JR It's nice of you to try to make the OP feel better and I'm sure you are probably right, at least I hope so. Still some issues here though. What you describe is just lengthening the forcing cones not deepening the chamber. No comparison. Reducing recoil? Laws of physics say otherwise. Better patterns? Where is the evidence for this? Sherman Bell's experiments on this subject were very informative but he never mentioned the added strength the shell casing provides to the chamber wall. Not at all negible and where it extends into the forcing cone will also add it's pressure resisting strength to that area. Any increase in pressure caused by the constriction of the case mouth will be mitigated by the added wall strength. My main complaint is still the same. People reaming deeper chambers without first measuring and profiling the barrels. In a country with no proof laws. Jesus wept. Step away from the cliff, Nial. It's all very minimal. JR
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364 |
Yes of course. What was I thinking of?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,275 Likes: 460
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,275 Likes: 460 |
Yes of course. What was I thinking of? British guns and their delicate nature. Elsies don't need no stinking proof. JR
Be strong, be of good courage. God bless America, long live the Republic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78 |
"the added strength the shell casing provides to the chamber wall."
Seriously?
Shirley you jest.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741 Likes: 1368
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741 Likes: 1368 |
Always missing from the internet discussion boards on this topic, is the part where the original poster is (supposed) to say, "I have spent the better part of the last year patterning my (insert brand name of gun, here) with this (type of ammunition, here) and have discovered a problem, that can't be resolved by using (insert different brand or type of ammunition, here).
Why does it always go this way? At no point was it noted by anyone to start there, to see what he had.
To the OP. if your gun ended up with 2 3/4" chambers by accident, that is too bad, but, not insurmountable. It seems your notions of what to use in the gun, for the shooting you do henceforth are sound. A little testing will go a long ways, I assure you. Patterning guns is about as dull a past time activity as one can come up with, but, one that carries huge dividends, later.
I have had exactly one gun that I couldn't get useful patterns with, at typical ranges I shoot at, with ammunition I had on hand. I honestly believe I would have, but, sold the gun before I did.
Carry on.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,347 Likes: 653
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,347 Likes: 653 |
I have had exactly one gun that I couldn't get useful patterns with, at typical ranges I shoot at, with ammunition I had on hand. I honestly believe I would have, but, sold the gun before I did.
If you're referring to the R-15 20 gauge....don't feel bad. That thing didn't or just couldn't throw decent patterns no matter what shell was used. I spent a lot of time and money trying to unlock that guns secrets, never could get it figured out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 364 |
Shirley I do not jest. You tube has many people who delight in making improvised shotguns. Iron pipe slide firing, plastic flare gun modified to handle shot shells, etc, etc. That stuff is tremendous fun. Scope to try all sorts of ideas and find out stuff for yourself. Make a 12 gauge barrel from a piece of PVC pipe. Reinforce with couplings, then turn down the outside diameter until it blows. Informative fun. Every thousand added to wall thickness has an effect. From ignition to projectile clearing the muzzle the intervening space is just a pressure vessel. People have been fooling with this stuff for ages. You, well maybe not you exactly, could figure out the hoop strength of the shotgun chamber. Then figure out the hoop strength of the shell case and add it to the former. At one time there were people who doubted that the Earth was a sphere.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741 Likes: 1368
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,741 Likes: 1368 |
Dustin, I suspected that gun was among the first that was produced after Paul Bruchet retired for good. The barrel boring machine at Bruchet/ Darne was 2 stories tall, bored the barrels lengthwise, and was something only a very skilled individual should have been close to. That was Paul. Hindsight is always 20/20, but, I would have liked to have had someone like Stan Baker look at those bores, and get his input.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78 |
A Cheddite plastic case measures .025" of work hardened plastic.
It might hold 3 BAR. Let's say it will hold 10 BAR (145 PSI).
At a working pressure of 800 BAR, that is (at the very maximum) a percent and a half.
That's lost in the noise of shell to shell variation.
The Earth is an Oblate Spheroid.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109 Likes: 78 |
It would be simple enough to test.
Find a rubber plug that fits a shell and drill it for an inflation needle, you know, the kind Tom Brady uses to deflate footballs. Hose clamp to open crimp.
Clamp the thing down so the primer can't blow out, and turn on the air compressor.
If it gets to 30 PSI, I would be shocked.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
|