I've been hunting on FWS properties for decades with non-toxic ammo. Easy to do and it is a non-issue to me and many. Kinda like if you are anti-abortion don't have one. The rest of you can and should stay home.
Nice sentiment, but ignores the issue of whether or not the increased cost and decreased lethality have any real science that statistically demonstrates a significant need for such a ban.
Yes we can use non tox and I have used non tox to access some less hunted land under that restriction in South Dakota, but it ignores the point. The directive is political and not good policy.
