My gosh old hypocrite, I mean old colonel, step back and take a deep breath before you hyperventilate. You began your reply to me yesterday with the absurd observation that I cannot read or understand your posts, and then go on to demonstrate that it is you who can't read, understand, or make a valid argument in reply.
I'm only going to address a couple things here since you get overly excited and are prone to seeing things that aren't there.
First, I'd like you to show us where I ever said that King's quote about the opinions of Supreme Court Justice Burger were intended by me to illustrate that he is a liar.
I'm not going to explain it to you just now. I thought it was pretty simple, but apparently not simple enough for you. I just want you to show us what you accused me of.
After you are unable to do that, I'd like you to show us where I claimed that those quotes of King's anti-2nd Amendment rhetoric are examples of his own thread diversions. I did provide some examples of those too when I mentioned a small fraction his frequent trips into off-topic land such as... Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, pulpwood clear-cutting, "the ruinous racial legacy of the U.S. that almost tore the country apart in a Civil War", Civil Rights in the 1960's, producing an award winning wine--- which was actually made by someone else, and dozens of other non-double-gun topics. But I did not use direct quotes from him since most regulars here are quite familiar with his fulminations and B.S. Nor did I wish to reproduce entire threads within this thread just to provide a simpleton like you with "context". I really didn't think that was necessary for anyone with average intelligence. But if I really need to dumb things down to your level, just let me know.
You really seem stuck on the notion that my observation of your hypocrisy is centered around diversions that involve the 2nd Amendment. And this paranoid idea you have that I am somehow believing, or accusing you of being "a closet supporter of the denial of Second Amendment rights" is both false and absurd. Are you that desperate to prove your point that you have to make shit up?
If I ever hold the opinion that you are a 2nd Amendment troll and a supporter of anti-gun politicians like King or Ed Good, don't worry, I won't beat around the bush. I'll let you know directly and back up my opinions with direct quotes of your own words. And I'll make certain to do it when it is obvious that you are attempting to fly under the radar and pretend that you are pro-gun.
Here's an idea for you. Why don't you follow the example of King's little brother Larry and cry like a baby and ask Dave to lock this thread. When that doesn't work, you can say that you are ignoring my posts, but still respond to them. Oh, sorry, I forgot you already do that. And I'm sorry for bringing up more than one simple point at a time since you have such a rough time with that.
