Based on what you have written:
You believe I single you out for diving into threads to divert them by injection personal attacks and cut and paste gun control related direct criticisms against someone posting in that otherwise unrelated thread.
You further believe that others regularly do this and I omit taking them similarly to task.
I note you fail to show any examples of this failure on my part to identify a repeat diverter of threads. You do note an exchange between you and King in August of 2015, but I don't see where that person jumped into a unrelated to gun control thread and injected the gun control issue. As for who told the truth then or now I cannot know. Not sure I care if you are both right or wrong in what appears to belong on a Judge Judy, my feelings got hurt episode.
What I can know is my call is for stopping the diversions of topics (as I have given up asking you to be civil in an earlier thread). Even "Faux Civility" is beyond what you seem to be willing to practice.
Keith who remains hidden, and likely to be forever so, my name is Michael, as shown in my profile email address Michael Dittamo. I am neither Richard, etc.
I now understand that your attack on King was first related to what you believe was his truthfulness in having the problem he described that was followed by you normal pasting of unrelated gun control trivia which clouded your intent. Like it really matters if the perfection of his question changed the nature of the discussion. Perhaps for a purist it might, but August of 2015 wow, the stinging attack on your character must still be hot and painful. Perhaps I should be wary of your future wrath and continue my Civility or stop challenging your strong, well grounded, and inherently excellent arguments altogether.
If my civility is Faux Civility that is better than your lack of civility, if I frustrate you in challenging your off topic attacks and remind everyone who bothers to read what the character of your particular posting is so be it.
What you have made clear to me is this really is all about animus and not principle.
If you were really interested in articulating and winning an argument about the Second Amendment then you would be arguing idea and facts and not name calling. You are capable of engaging in discussions without diatribe.
Maybe I should return to ignoring your bothersome posts. I wonder if Dave Webber tracks who is the most ignored poster on the website?
Maybe I should identify trolling when I see it with a trolling picture. You seem more than willing to paste and paste again stuff that has nothing to do with the thread, I could adopt your style of argument every time you insert a diversion of cut and paste with a clear notice of what it is for those who do not have you placed on ignore?
If you don't like what I post you too can place me on ignore.
PS I am surprised you defended the Obama Administration Department of Homeland Security as the source of the block that prohibited Mike Orlen from being able to ship the barrels back if King had sent them to him. Is it more important to attack King and Canada than identify the problems of US based export and import rules for sporting gun owners?
