|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
934
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,344
Posts574,147
Members14,700
| |
Most Online32,084 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,440 Likes: 1847
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,440 Likes: 1847 |
Lets say a guy (me) has a Nitro Special that has spiffy 26" barrels were to stumble on a set of 28" tubes and forend from a Western Arms gun in the same gauge. Would there be a snowball's chance in hades that the Western barrels could be mated up to the Nitro without major trouble? I guess I'd prefer actual hands on experience, rather than speculation, but, feel free to post speculation, if you call it that when you post it.
Many thanks in Advance,
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,405
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,405 |
The two makes, although very similar do not interchange when it comes to barrels.
B.Dudley
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,608 Likes: 109
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,608 Likes: 109 |
Along time ago I did it but I don't remember which model was the extra barrels or how much hassle it was.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,912 Likes: 686
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,912 Likes: 686 |
Nitro Special barrels are not that hard to come across, even with a forend. I'd just wait until an easier to fit set comes along.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,440 Likes: 1847
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,440 Likes: 1847 |
Nitro Special barrels are not that hard to come across, even with a forend. I'd just wait until an easier to fit set comes along. Well, there is that... While I've never had both makes apart side by side on a bench before, it seemed the two were very similar in the back of my mind. I guess they aren't. Thanks again. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,465 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,465 Likes: 89 |
The mind has a way of pulling tricks on one....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 534 Likes: 23
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 534 Likes: 23 |
I have both. The distance from hinge pin to breech face is longer on the NS. The trip location is different on each also. I have not checked the barrel extension. Not home now so can't take a look until this evening. The NID is also very similar to both. I will compare those also.
John
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,405
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,405 |
The rib extentoons are different as well.
And the NID is completely different all together.
B.Dudley
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,228 Likes: 891
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,228 Likes: 891 |
The rib extentoons are different as well.
And the NID is completely different all together.
This is why I come here... to read posts that state the obvious. Do you think barrels from an L.C. Smith or Parker would fit if Ted used the right lube on the knuckle to get them to slip together???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
The extension rib on both the NS & WA re slotted to take a wedge bolt which swings in from the side. The NID bolts with a rotary bolt so obviously the extension rib is totally different.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|