Originally Posted By: King Brown
One elite replaced by another.

So they're equivalent, eh?

Did you ever read the mission statement for the 'commission on presidential debates'? In the 'news' heading, they don't once mention following up on admissions from a debate venue, that they selected, about feeding 'debate' questions to just one of the candidates.

Did you see the Trump/60 min 'interview'. Every major campaign issue was poked and prodded, with the President Elect answering. Did hill get vetted that way on the trail? Did bo ever get two or three tough ones in a row, or was it always pc to defer to racism or prowess on the basketball court, maybe a gratuitous climate change talking point?

If you were a campaign journalist, which candidate would you have preferred to follow. The one that you couldn't even talk to, where you waited for occasional scripted crumbs. Or, the one that made history? Who's the elite, the infirm tyrant or the next President? Ha, both.