|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,591
Posts546,779
Members14,425
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Quote:
"To reiterate, rules and regulations promulgated by federal agencies are explications of federal law; but they are not law. Only Congress can make or change federal law. Government agencies may be authorized by Congress to promulgate rules and regulations, which must find support in existing federal law. However, if there is no authorizing basis in federal law upon which to justify the creation of the rule or regulation, the federal agency obviously cannot promulgate the same because no requisite underlying legal authority or the remotest rationale for it to do so exists. "
And the current Libtard idiot occupying the White House has made a mockery of what's stated in this quoted paragraph. Fortunately soon he'll just be a bad memory not to be replicated if everyone gets out and votes in November.
Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,466 Likes: 213
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,466 Likes: 213 |
Edwardian, truly thank you very much. When the topic came up involving the importation of a firearm from another country, I mistakenly thought that Toby may have been referring to the DDTC policy change that did not appear to distinguish antiques in any of the various ways that other agencies may use the word. Thank you for your clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,515 Likes: 221
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,515 Likes: 221 |
The fear is ATF will rule that modern muzzleloaders are not replicas; therefore, not antiques, so come under their "firearms" regs.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753 |
Not that I want to see them regulated
But modern muzzleloader are not replicas
At least not the inlines
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
Its stated in the law that percussion and flintlock and prior ignition are not subject to regulation by the federal government. The states have additional regulation but most simply follow the federal law. They cannot change the law without congress.
Correct????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
