There was a time when I believed the Anson button release forend was simply the right way for a double gun to be built. It looks classy, gives the engraver something more to work his artistry on and lends some sophistication to the takedown of the gun. I considered the snap forend the poorer sister of the Anson. Always seen on the lower end American boxlocks, that was the easy conclusion to come to. But, my preference is evolving. The Anson style forend always seems to have a bit of movement, when it is closed, and as the gun is opened, and it glides across the knuckle. The movement seems exagerated in ejector guns, but, I don't seek those guns out, and have owned few. That movement, slight as it is, bugs me. The retaining spring can only be fitted so tightly, or you couldn't push the button in to remove it. The snap forend, doesn't seem to suffer that problem, at least not in the examples I've owned, including, among others, a higher grade MacNaughton boxlock, and a lowly Nitro Special. The wood is held tightly in the better examples I have seen. I remember reading a Michael MacIntosh article, years ago, on what to do if your Anson button got stuck, but, don't see the need for that same article on a snap forend.
Since someone will likely point it out anyway, yes, the front wood on a Darne is rigid, and doesn't move, period, unless you remove some screws. It is my favorite system, but, I use and enjoy other guns. The guns fitted with the lever forend seem to be tighter as well, but, save a lone German gun that went down the road long ago, I've not owned any.
I'm willing at this point to cut the poorer sister design some slack, and remember it is mostly fool-proof and simple to use, and to fit or repair.
Excellent traits in a hunting implement.
Best,
Ted
