The OP got an answer he didn't like, and now he's looking for someone else to give him the one he wants and will like.
Ok there, it may have come across that way, but I certainly did not go looking for an opinion in the hopes of hearing things I like. I have decided against buying it. My final post was more of a curiosity in regards to dealing with a situation like the one Mr Hause wrote out. I'm not a lawyer, I don't know the legal system that well, I'm not trying to be a snake. I just don't see how in a hypothetical situation like that the seller could be found at fault when he gave the "plaintiff" specific instructions on what not to do with the gun. Maybe that's just proof enough that I should stay the hell away from guns made in that era, and just shut my trap when I get expert advice.
