John, no one is on you for following the rules. We would if we were in your position.

It is for excusing the government for its interference in a business as a way to force people to give up their guns. It is for not understanding that this is a process that the antis hope will end with the disarming of the citizens. It is for suggesting by inference that it is just typical government red tape. As Keith so accurately notes, they aren't driving low volume auto dealers out of the business as a matter of policy.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia