What you call strict I believe reasonable.
Every year Canada's and Australia's "gun rights" dribble away. A converted revolver's original caliber makes it illegal now, and it is so by just a police fiat. Australia's parliament has or is about to make certain lever action long arms illegal.
And so, in this forum, you argue for US politicians and a party that would impose "reasonable" gun control on us. You tell us that our Second Amendment rights are not important when we vote, that social justice, inequality, and redistribution of wealth are paramount issues for us.
You simultaneously criticize our choices and refuse to debate specifics. Do you think law-abiding American citizens should be able to own semi-auto rifles with removable magazines? What about semi-auto pistols?
Do you think we should have to have background checks when we give a shotgun to our son or sell one to our next door neighbor?
These issues are where the skirmish line is now in the US. If we lose those then a different class of weapons will be marked by the Democrats, say pump shotguns or lever action rifles.
But you won't take a stand because you know you can't defend those "reasonable" restrictions.
And you praise Obama and the Democrats and their politicians that want to suppress our rights. You snipe, slander, and smear the party and the candidates that support our Second Amendment rights. Even though it is settled law that the Second Amendment means we have a personal right to keep and bare arms you dispute that SCOTUS decision.
I think you frequently speak against the gun rights that Americans currently have. Appears you are happy with the ones that you still have.
