Originally Posted By: dal
'...to suggest our guns laws are not strict in comparison to the US...'

Where my statement did I 'suggest' your statement above?

'kieth....tell us about our Canadian gun laws and how strict they are please.'

Please read my text, not what you 'think' I said.

In Canada I can own handguns, black guns, hunting guns. I can take my handguns, black guns and hunting guns to shooting ranges across the province. I can sell handguns, and black guns and hunting guns across the country without using an FFL. I can keep handguns and black guns and hunting guns in my house. My kids have been shooting guns since their early teens. During the hunting season, I take my guns to work and go hunting till last light.

The fact that I can't walk around the streets with hand guns and black guns, hunt cougars with a desert eagle, or keep a loaded .45 beside my bed, does not make me feel any less of a gun owner. The fact that I cannot own ANY type of military firearm, does not make me any less of a gun owner. I currently have nearly a dozen guns, not bad for a soon to be labeled anti-gunner.

There is a price for the 'all or nothing attitude', unfortunately your paying the price in spades. Which is fine, have at it.



Are you not suggesting Canadian laws are not particularly strict when compared to the US? That you can enjoy guns relatively unimpeded by restrictive regulations when compared to the US?

It seems relatively disingenuous to suggest you were not, that a careful reading of your statement would suggest otherwise and then to go on in your next post, quoted here, to show just how unimpeded you are.

So which is it. In comparison to US laws are you saying they are strict or not strict? I can read words with the best of them. Including the words that indicate your are playing with meaning.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia