I gave you the answer. We spend billions of dollars a year on security measures like Instant Check, No Fly Lists, Airport Security, etc., but due to political correctness, we get grief and whining from the Liberal Left whenever there is an attempt to watch or restrict the rights of a guy like Omar Mateen who had a history of support and contact with Radical Islam.

In the minds of people like Ed, King. and Jagermeister, guys like this terrorist are innocent until proven guilty, but law abiding gun owners are presumed guilty just because they wish to exercise their Constitutional freedoms.

I must provide my I.D. and undergo a background check every time I buy a gun. Guilt is presumed until I prove otherwise. But Democrats complain that it is Unconstitutional to ask someone for I.D. before they vote.

I know you will not accept my answer. Maybe you'd be happy if I just blamed Bush and Cheney. Or maybe you can share your thoughts on why no-one stopped this guy. It's not like his support and associations with radical Islam were an unknown quantity. Trump wants to stop this crap, and Hillary accuses him of building walls instead of bridges. And she wants to bring in even more unvetted Muslim refugees than Obama, and continue our open border policy. Oh yeah... she wants to ban guns and sue gun manufacturers until they go bankrupt too.


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug