Hang on to your seat old colonel. If I didn't point this out, people like you might actually think Larry Clown is smart:
I think you are smart and say some good things now and again, though not all the time. Not in the best way to serve the ideas you seem to espouse.
I think Larry is smart and says some good things now and again, though not all the time, as you note in the repetitive extreme.
I think I am smart enough to know a few good things and mess up other things time to time. My most recent stupidity is my attempt at asking for civility and arguments based on issues than personal attack.
You style of personal attack argument clouds the question I made to Larry which was what was the source for his eagle casualty fact, which was per him a government press release (but unfortunately he did not provide a link to it)
I take the hypocrisy of the left on "green energy" amongst other things to heart.
Not sure why you can't also believe that point of the left's two faced approach of going after guns and lead while massacring eagles, a supposed critical to be saved and protected resource per their normal mode of operation, is very sad and speaks to the character of their policies.
Your one trick pony approach is a rather tiresome and not very imaginative pounding. You could use your energy far more productively. I imagine you have a huge cut and paste file set up to proliferate our webpages.
Larry brought a good fact out and I simply wanted to know more on it. Why would you not want to know more about it, I know you care about the way the left pursues their agenda?
BTW I agree the statement below is erroneous and rather silly. Though I do not know when Larry made it or the complete context of the conversation (i don't care to research it), I definitely disagree with it in the context you present it.
"The school shooters at Sandy Hook and Virginia Tech--non-Muslim wackos--killed more people in just those two attacks than Americans killed by Muslims in this country and in Europe."
You are right that the facts simply don't even come close and you do a good job laying out some numbers. Not sure why you have to ice the arguments with personal slights and dispersions.
I doubt my words will have any impact on your method. I realize that I am foolish to bother. I will have to simply read around your and others cut and paste purgations.
