doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com behavior?

Keith, is there really anybody left on the board who does not know your opinions of some of the other members. Couldn't you give it a break and only post the personal diatribe once a week? Say maybe on Thursdays so I know not to bother checking the website?

I doubt you will convert anyone as most of us are well past opinion formation having lived long enough to know better. If anyone needs convincing and can be convinced it is not those who frequent this board.

Well old colonel, Ed and King and Jagermeister do not think there is even one anti-gun Troll among us. So there's three right there that still need convincing. This entire thread has nothing to do with Doubles, so why would you expect only me to conform to your standards? I might actually consider your request if I didn't notice just how selective you are in what you find unacceptable. But considering the validity of your complaint, I'd have to say you are just wasting your time.

You could always try ignoring me like Larry Clown. Oh wait... ever since he informed me that he is ignoring me, he has about worn out his keyboard responding to me, or unilaterally insulting me.

Well I guess the three members of this board you cite is worth bothering the rest of us.

I have not blocked anyone as I believe everyone on this boad to include the four you note have good things to say now and again I appreciate their input. Maybe I am too much the optimist, though I do note today I noticed a fact listed by Larry today that caught my attention reference "acceptable" eagle kill levels, I may have missed it in the past, but had I blocked him I would have missed it again.

Every thread does not have to be a right to bear arms event. I imagine the members of this board could arm a battalion, I know I could near two squads.

Take care

Not everyone here is bothered by what I post. Some tell me they agree with me by PM, and others publicly voice their support along with their own disapproval of anti-gun Trolls and their rhetoric. You don't seem to care about our opinions or feelings, so I can't imagine why I would worry about yours.

I know that the majority of guys here have an above average number of guns. But the mere act of owning or shooting guns does not automatically indicate support for the 2nd Amendment. Do you remember the extreme anti-gun journalist Carl Rowan who got arrested in Washington D.C. after shooting at kids who went swimming in his pool? How about anti-gun Democrat U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. who was arrested at O�Hare airport when TSA personnel found an unloaded .25-caliber pistol and a loaded magazine inside the garment bag he was taking through the security checkpoint? Or how about Illinois Democrat State Sen. Donne Trotter who also was charged with felony attempt to board an airplane with a weapon? There are plenty more, and there are quite a few gun owners who support and defend anti-gun politicians and do everything they can to censor anything that shines a light on what they do to take away our rights. King says there should be no litmus test, and that we should embrace the Trojan Horses in our midst... the same guy who has made literally thousands of judgemental posts and non-ad hominem attacks in his time here.

Sorry, your argument is not even a bit convincing.

I am glad the "Ignore" feature is available for those who choose to use it. I tried it, and find it to be no great shakes. I mean, after all, why would I ask my computer to do something for me that I can do myself?

Please, I'm not belittling anybody who likes the feature, we are all different in many ways. That's a good thing mostly, and I'm probably more different than most ............ which may contribute to my being perplexed at this.

SRH

Stan, it's like driving by a car wreck. You don't want to see it, you don't need to see it, but you look anyway. If it is not there you don't look...Geo

Geo, is that why you recently started a totally off topic thread that you admitted knowing would cause dissent and heated discussion? Pardon me for not being impressed by your sincerity and concern for Kumbaya here when you yourself has been known to throw gasoline on the fire.

I used to think misfires should have been dropped. I've changed my mind. I think the main board is now cluttered with misfires stuff. Maybe Dave could bring it back for a trial run and get misfires stuff where it belongs, cuz it's pretty obvious, misfires topic/threads are never going away?? IMHO, anyway.

Hello, buzz

But that will give the FAGs (Fake Ass Gentlemen) a case of the flaming fantods complaining to Dave about the stuff they never read.

________________________________
What's the best way to tune a banjo? Wire cutters.
http://youtu.be/-9fdwMZXcAY

Keith, None of us can control what others say (save the webmaster from time to time through deletion). We can influence people mostly where they maybe predisposed to go. We can ultimately only control what we say ourselves and how we react to what others post.

I do not disagree some of the anti thoughts have been said by some. However given the little level of value I give them, I can't recall them. I guess I could see them again and again if I read your constant reposting of them, which gives them far greater publicity than if they were argued against at the time then forgotten. i miss misfires as most of the diatribe stayed there.