Craig, the only thing I said on the previous page about what an honorable discharge has proven is this:
"But anyone who's come out of the military with an honorable discharge has proven something others have not." Just to clarify, since you apparently didn't/don't understand....
....Opens the door to you to start one where you can talk about defending gun rights all you want. And people can go there expecting to hear about gun rights. At which point you're playing by the rules to say whatever is on your mind....
...."I may not believe in what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Pretty much how I feel about Ed or Kerry or anyone else who chooses to post here. The part about staying on topic . . . well, that's just common courtesy. Which some folks clearly lack. But hey, they're also into misrepresenting the statements of others--so what can you expect?....
Hiya Lar,
If I ever get invited over to your place, I know highly doubtful, will you be okay if I tramp around on your furniture exercising my first amendment right? Maybe we should remember who's house this is before we get the french to defend our right to free speech.
As to reading and comprehension problems, you said, 'the debate on what constitutes support of the 2A. Military service clearly does'. It's back just a page or two. You 'clarification' is kind of like back peddling.
Anyway, if you'd rather not start your own thread, why open the door? No, I don't think you're a mud wrestling pig, but if the pen fits jump in and wallow?