Miller,
I think you're overly sensitive and dramatic. Your anamorphic descriptions of my statements are entertaining. If I had "attacked" your post, it would not have been subtle.

I think you and I aren't reading the same forum. I thought you spent the last 3-4 pages dispelling my statement that many early 20th century guns had shorter forcing cones than 5*.

Once you have acquired a database of all early 20th century shotgun forcing cones and ensured there are no significant numbers of guns made with forcing cones steeper than 5*, my statement that included "many" and "longer", can be discredited and you can reign supreme as the Iron Fact Finder. Don't forget the British and continental guns. As the nut people say: Get crackin.

Last edited by Chuck H; 11/10/15 04:46 PM.