And I always strongly disagreed with that testing and the publishing of his results. They held, but the way I look at it, those results can or should have only been applied to those specific set of twist barrels and no others. There is just to many variables that apply to twist barrels to reliably apply his results across the entire spectrum of twist barrels.
But its your eyes not mine.
I suppose that safety crash testing of new automobiles has no relevance to others made the same because the one that was tested was the only one exactly like itself? Why do destructive testing on anything? It has no relevance because each specific item tested is destroyed? Preposterous.
SRH
