S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (CLG),
581
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,498
Posts562,105
Members14,586
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4 |
I have looked at few of these and have to admit they handle better than their appearance suggests. This gun is worth quite a bit because most guys that like Winchesters have disposable incomes. I would say given configuration and condition $2750+/-250. Personally I would rather buy 3" Wildfowler from the famous Birmingham Small Arms factory. Even model Deluxe with basic scroll engraving and ejectors would cost much less than field grade Model 21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673 |
I have looked at few of these and have to admit they handle better than their appearance suggests. This gun is worth quite a bit because most guys that like Winchesters have disposable incomes. I would say given configuration and condition $2750+/-250. Personally I would rather buy 3" Wildfowler from the famous Birmingham Small Arms factory. Even model Deluxe with basic scroll engraving and ejectors would cost much less than field grade Model 21. Jagermeister, this sounds like Harley-Davidson advice from one of those guys who has a Harley tattoo and a Harley tee shirt, but who does not even own a bicycle. You don't even own any doubles and frequently post your support for anti-gun politicians in Misfires. Internet Trolls win acceptance by pretending to be something they're not.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,245 Likes: 423
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,245 Likes: 423 |
Knowing now that you don't want to lose money on it, I'll tell you to pass.
Condition is too low, too much goop swabbed on it, to many dents dings and scratches.
Keep looking.
And then pay $500.00 too much for a higher condition example.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 916 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 916 Likes: 1 |
I'll never understand the attraction of the Model 21. Heavy for gauge, unattractive lines, crazy expensive. I'll never understand why detractors of the 21 often seem compelled to express their lack of understanding ... which contributes what to this discussion? Jay Obviously, people are free to like any shotgun, and are free to pay whatever price they want for a shotgun. But what am I misunderstanding about these three characteristics? The M21 is heavy for gauge, the receiver is bulky, and they are crazy expensive for what you get . . . ? And, the contribution to this discussion is that the original question was "Is it a $4000 gun" and the answer is "No, it is not a $4000 gun." My fault for phrasing it in a way that some may not have understood. JMHO This opinion has zero to do with the question, which is about market value of this gun. Your comments are about 21s in general, no relevance to the asking price for this one. But then you know that ... sometimes I get sucked in by troll-like comments.
Last edited by Gunflint Charlie; 08/20/15 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418 Likes: 2 |
if you just want a good solid Winchester 21 shooter this could be a nice gun, as could be vabirdguns 21 if its what he says it is....but at $2750.....no more just remember you can pick up a nice NID, LC Smith, Fox for 1/3 to 1/2 that price.....the rest of the price is Winchester mystique and nothing more.....some folks think its worth it.. others think they are nuts....your call.. 
gunut
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114 |
As to market value here-I can't say, as I have not yet purchased a Model 21, in any gauge or configuration. A close friend from our pheasant hunting club bought a 1939 M21 Tournament Grade skeet gun in 12 gauge-- 28" std matted rib barrels choked WS-1 and WS-2, SST, EJ, PG stock and BT forearm, all original and not refinished- He paid $3250 including shpg., bought in 3 years ago from Wm. L. Moore & Sons in AZ. So, would you pay aprox. $800.00 more from a field grade gun with DT and Ext. that retailed for aprox. $59.95 when it first hit the market. If you paid 4K for it today, could you recover that if the proverbial "Wolf comes to the door" (assuming you had another gun to dispatch the wolf with at hand)??
I buy used L.C. Smiths because there were so many of them made, especially in my favorite all-round gauge, that being 12. I don't try to buy used A.H. Fox guns, because there were way fewer of them made than L.C. Smiths, and I like to have the Laws of Supply&Demand working for me when I open my checkbook.
I would like to own and shoot a M21, but not at these prices. This high $ dealer, much perhaps like Kevins in Thomasville GA. not ashamed of his pricing I should guess, may well be asking such a high $ price because of it's antiquity by serial number. To some "collectors" that is of consideration in the pricing I suppose, just as to others, owning the M21 in 12 gauge given to "Joltin' Joe DiMaggio" would be worth way more than a similar M21 made the same year and month and day, with identical configuration and details (SST, EJ, etc.)
Even if I had $4000 that I could use to wipe my arse with in deer camp and not lose sleep over performing that wasteful sort of stunt, I would pass on this DT 12 with extractors. I have a 12 Parker Trojan SN 211440 made in aprox 1924- the later series w/o the small Doll's Head rib extension- that also has DT and Ext, like the M21 being discussed here, original finish, wood, metal, unturned and properly indexed screws and original BP, with uncut stock or barrels- 28" M&F, that is maybe worth $2k, half that of this M21 ( with possibly refinished wood?) and has the same features, possibly same weight and balance. My Trojan 12 weighs 7 & 1/2 lbs.
Also the Ithaca NID series in a 12 with DT and Ext. "Hell for Stout" like the Parker Trojans and VH(E) shotguns, perhaps not so pricey as the Parkers. Worth your consideration perhaps as well. Just my 2 cents worth.
I have yet to own a complete M21, and if I ever buy one, it will be a 12 gauge, of course, and in the pre- Custom shop field grade configuration. I did buy a M21 barrel set a few years ago, at a gun show (where I sometimes find good buys on gun parts--I am going to keep them, as I am hoping to find a receiver, stock and forearm to fit- I am also hoping to win the Publisher's Clearing House Lottery as well. 28" solid matted rib, choked Imp. Cyl. & Mod. extractor bar or ejector blades missing, take up adjusting screw, and the semi-self-opening assisting spring and cam are in the barrel lug, 90% blue, with some wear at forearm installed position, no dents or dings. SN is 15992. Every one is a while I see ads in the DGJ for "missing guns in parts- mostly WTB" so, who knows--maybe I can put together a "Lunchboxed" 12 M21 and find out what all the mystique is about. I love pre- 1950 Model 12's- and 12 is 21, just reversed, like God and Dog, right???
"The field is the touchstone of the man"..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,553
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,553 |
Shinbone, I don't think you're misunderstanding much mate... $4000 ,or even 3k for such a gun seems crazy to me, but some folk love 'em. Each to his own taste,what? But to answer the OPs Qs..imho a big no to both
franc
Last edited by Franc Otte; 08/20/15 04:22 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278 |
Francis, let me know how much you want for those barrels. As much as it hurts me to say this, "I need them.". Please be kind to me. I am on a fixed income and my lovely wife has quit her job.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 244
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 244 |
Franc - thanks for the honest answer.
And, like I said in a previous post, people are free to like any gun they want to like.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Since the subject of handling has come up, suppose we take an objective look at the M-21. My database has 16 M-21's, 10 12's, 316's, and 3 20's. The following is for 12 bore guns. A 7# 3 1/2oz, 26" bbl, 14 1/4" LOP gun balances (teeter-totter point) 4 5/8" ahead of the trigger, has unmounted swing of 1.23, mounted swing of 6.78, and compactness (note that lower numbers indicate higher compactness) of 8.89. An 8# 6oz, 32" bbl, 15 1/8" LOP gun has a balance point of 5 1/8" to trigger, unmounted swing of 2.34, mounted swing of 9.75, and compactness of 11.35. As you can see, there is a wide range of handling characteristics for M-21's; it makes little sense to try to stereotype them. Consider that an average Brit game gun (6# 8oz, 28" bbls, 14 1/4" LOP) has balance of 4 1/2" to trigger, 1.45 unmounted swing, 6.38 mounted, and 10.17 compactness. The first gun is "faster" unmounted than a typical Brit game gun and a bit slower when mounted.
Questiions?
DDA
|
|
|
|
|