doublegunshop.com - home Forums What Liberalism REALLY Is

King you're entitled to believe whatever you want.
However; The facts point to your liberal "beliefs" as a catastrophe for the United States.
Virtually every aspect of our economy and society is worse off now than it was in 2008.
And the blame is being placed squarely where it belongs. Either that or the major voter polls are all wrong.
The only Democrat President the didn't cause an economic disaster in the Country going back to Johnson was Clinton. Of course he'll NEVER take the responsibility for the housing meltdown.
And the reason for that is Clinton was smart enough not to tinker with the policies put in place by the Reagan administration.
The economic recovery that took place under Clinton was universally agreed to be due to the steps taken during the Reagan administration.
We will be years in digging out of the mess created by Obama and his cohorts.

It's what you say you believe Burger King. Now tell us what you are doing on a personal level for the poor miserable lower class wretches who struggle to eat and keep warm in the cold Nova Scotia winter... aside from pressing an agenda that calls for our labors to be taxed and redistributed to Welfare cheats and people who broke the law to enter our country.

I can only hope there is a sub-basement in Hell reserved for Athiests who use lies and the Bible to propagate their own dishonesty.



Oh ed, "do as I say, not as I do" is not from the Bible. That would be one of King Brown's credos.

Comrade King,

Once again, you're the gift that keeps on giving.

"As a liberal, I believe each is responsible to everyone for everything".

What a sociopathic, sanctimonious, subjective, load of Horse Manure. Your capacity for pseudo-elitist self delusion is amazing. You may believe such subjective claptrap and mumbo-jumbo about yourself, but you anti-intellectually use it as a rationalization to sociopathically inflict your beliefs on others. Does in occur to you that your beliefs are purely Collectivist in nature? Does it occur to you that you have no right to declare that "each" is responsible to "everyone" and is simply Religious Statism, where the concept of the individual (as well as individual freedom) does not exist?

"Friend, father, husband, neighbor, citizen". No doubt the average guard at Auschwitz or one of the Soviet Gulags thought the same way about themselves.

You Comrade King, are the disease, and freedom from pseudo-elitist statist religious sociopaths like you is the cure.

Old and kind of cute, Doug. Pity Diaz doesn't understand meaning of the word. Without context, racists are all whites who vote for whites and all blacks who vote for blacks.

A majority of Americans with first opportunity in more than 200 years to vote for a black presidential candidate chose Obama twice because they felt he was preferable to the alternative.

Blacks voted en masse for him not from a sense of racial superiority but on the chance a member of a repressed minority would see more clearly the need for greater equality. That is not racism.

Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:


1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

The term "poor" is completely subjective. Poverty statistics DO NOT include any government money or monetary equivalents disbursed through "anti-poverty" programs. Welfare recipients receive much more money/value via programs than most could ever hope to receive through entry level free market jobs. Why would you work? They're essentially "Professional Democrat Voters". Throw in the entitlement victim mentality (an indoctrinated statist religious belief) along with the belief that whatever you get is never enough, and you have the philosophical basis for Democrat power. All unconstitutional under both the "Establishment" as well as the "Equal Protection" clauses of the Constitution, and the result is that you have statist religious neoslavery. All based upon the involuntary exchange of goods and services. Religious Deification and Demonization. America is now much like the Confederacy, where whole segments (statist religious sub-cults) of the population live and feed off of the oppression of others.

So, in context, 1) the majority voted black based on feelings, and 2) blacks voted black because they 'need' greater equality. Isn't it kind of sad that your 'nonracist' point of view only recognizes skin color, not the man, his qualifications, or his abilities. Are you saying that only pc politicizors can define racism.

I and a majority of Canadians have chosen a way to live as a multicultural experiment, a federation of prudent governance, sharing our labour and natural riches for a national social standard that is the envy of the world. Conservatives and liberals contribute equally according to ability, individually and collectively, by province and federally, as regional economies change.

The result seems more satisfactory than a neighbour of dysfunctional governance, paying the Chinese in interest annually enough for its entire military program, where winning the Senate "to tie-up government for the next two years" is a proud sentiment of patriotism expressed by members here. An united political party makes a difference; individualism goes only so far.

Dictionaries define racism adequately, Craig. The American majority, mostly white, voted for a president it considered preferable to the alternative, as it does in every election, only this time he was black.

His colour didn't get in the way.

Qualifications certainly entered into it: the choice of a plutocrat who didn't appear to know who he was (railing against the 47 per cent) and a Chicago community organizer who might represent better their interests.

Stronger candidates and united party was consensus for GOP victories of our leading conservatives here this week.