doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Are the NID field grades under valued?

October
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Who's Online Now

2 members (SKB, 1 invisible), 477 guests, and 3 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Forum Statistics

Forums10

Topics39,489

Posts562,001

Members14,584

Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025

Print Thread

Re: Are the NID field grades under valued? Brian #375156 08/12/14 06:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 5,945 Likes: 144 WA/AK Researcher Sidelock
Researcher Sidelock Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 5,945 Likes: 144 WA/AK	Ithaca NID Field Grade 12-gauges are like Browning Superposed 12-gauges, great values in the current market, and they suck you in. Then you start wanting the other gauges, and that gets spendy -- http://www.gunsinternational.com/Ithaca-NID-Field-410-ga.cfm?gun_id=100342853 In the year Ithaca Gun Co. introduced the NID, 1926, the Field Grade went for $37.50. That same year, the A.H. Fox Gun Co. dropped the price of their Sterlingworth to $36.50 -- Last edited by Researcher; 08/12/14 06:25 PM.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Are the NID field grades under valued?	Brian	08/12/14 07:35 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Geo. Newbern	08/12/14 07:55 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	TwiceBarrel	08/12/14 08:54 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Brian	08/12/14 09:06 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/12/14 10:12 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Vernal Pike	08/12/14 11:47 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Jagermeister	08/13/14 02:00 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	L. Brown	08/13/14 11:49 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Ithaca5E	08/13/14 02:58 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	jmc	08/13/14 03:45 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	ed good	08/13/14 07:57 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	keith	08/13/14 08:04 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Brian	08/13/14 11:51 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	KY Jon	08/14/14 01:56 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Walter C. Snyder	08/14/14 02:07 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	GLS	08/14/14 12:52 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	von Falkenhorst	08/14/14 02:55 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	KY Jon	08/14/14 01:57 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Geo. Newbern	08/14/14 02:48 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	King Brown	08/14/14 03:03 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	canvasback	08/14/14 09:42 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/14/14 11:26 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	AmarilloMike	08/14/14 11:49 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Lawrence Kotchek	08/14/14 09:34 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	canvasback	08/15/14 12:49 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	2-piper	08/15/14 03:09 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Cary	08/15/14 12:06 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Run With The Fox	08/15/14 12:17 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	L. Brown	08/15/14 11:49 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Salopian	08/15/14 12:29 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Ted Schefelbein	08/15/14 12:59 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	canvasback	08/15/14 01:16 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	GLS	08/15/14 01:29 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Fin2Feather	08/15/14 01:35 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Ken61	08/15/14 03:01 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/15/14 03:54 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	L. Brown	08/15/14 09:42 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Drew Hause	08/15/14 05:16 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Drew Hause	08/15/14 10:48 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/16/14 12:48 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/16/14 12:50 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Drew Hause	08/16/14 02:32 AM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	L. Brown	08/16/14 01:13 PM
Re: Are the NID field grades under valued?	Researcher	08/16/14 02:08 PM

Link Copied to Clipboard

Updated every minute of everyday!

Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 4.793s Queries: 17 (0.581s) Memory: 0.8815 MB (Peak: 1.9027 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-05 15:15:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS