You never cease to amaze King. Just when I think you can't get any more dishonest, you give us a load of bullshit like your last post.

How can you say this with a straight face and then deny that you are a liar?--

Originally Posted By: King Brown
Your view last paragraph of perceptions unfortunately doesn't work with those members who turn a comment or quote from sources as not only my personal opinion but prevarication and dishonesty.


Here's your quote... your words... which I posted. These are not the comments or a quote from Mark Levin. These are your own words which you now have the gall to deny.

Originally Posted By: King Brown
Levin and Stevens, on this evidence, appear to believe that the Second amendment should only apply only to those who keep and bear arms while serving in the militia, and not as an individual right. Stevens goes further in his book, saying democratic processes should decide on the matter, not the judges, as a remedy for "what every American can recognize as an ongoing national tragedy."

All from a Reagan conservative and a Nixon-appointed jurist.


That was you King, who claimed that Levin and Stevens do not believe in an Individual RKBA. We all know Stevens doesn't, but Levin has never said that. You are attempting to ascribe beliefs to Levin which are NOT HIS. I didn't turn someone's personal opinion into your quote. These are your own words, and now you are essentially calling me a liar. In addition, you also said this about LIBERAL ex-Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens in the same post, #371868:

Originally Posted By: King Brown
Senator Stevens, a Republican appointee who served for 35 years on the Court with mostly Republican appointees and under three Republican chief justices, argues for amendments that would reduce the role of federal courts in American political life; in other words, amendments to entrench judicial restraint.


Now, you know damn well that ex-Justice Stevens was extreme Liberal Left in his rulings. You know he is now promoting a re-write of the Second Amendment because he so vehemently disagreed with the Heller decision recognizing an Individual Right and the right to bear arms for both national AND self-defense. Yet you went out of your way to paint him as a Conservative appointed by a Conservative, Richard Nixon. That wasn't exactly a lie. But it was very deceitful King.

In addition, you have not missed an opportunity to criticize the NRA except when you thought they were criticizing the open carry protesters in Texas. You abandoned your thread praising that when I told you that was the opinion of one staffer, and the NRA rebuked him and apologized for it. You claim you offered them help, but you only wanted them to lay down and allow the anti-gun Obama & Co. to have their way with us. You said you felt we should concede on Universal Registration... so you lied to Brian about imposing presumption of guilt type burdens on law abiding gun owners when you said his answers to the questions you would not answer seemed reasonable to you. In the aftermath of Newtown, you also said we should give up the fight against restrictions of high capacity clips (magazines). Your ideas of helping the NRA is like giving water to a drowning man.

You have gloated that the "Second is not inviolate" because it has been infringed upon in some locales by Liberal Leftist Democrat politicians who share your Leftist Socialist dogma, and who were elected by people of your Libtard mindset. You go on and on about the "Wild West Gun Culture" we have here, but all you had to say in Doug's recent thread about the killing and violence in Chicago last week was self serving crap where you again attack our notions about what the Second Amendment means... even though it is now settled law.:

Originally Posted By: King Brown
JRB, it is unusual for a Canadian to correct wacky American notions of the Second Amendment, particularly on a board with 28 pages under "Preserve the 2nd amendment thread---informational." Unusual but only ignorance or mean spirit would construe it as a protest of or attack on the Second Amendment.


Strange, to say the least, that you claim to not be anti-Second Amendment, yet you feel the need to correct our "wacky" notions of what it means, and those notions you agree with and tout and reproduce here are those of anti-gunners. Explain that. To say the Second is what the Courts say it is in dozens of jurisdictions actually is a knock on the Second Amendment now that the highest court in the land has made it settled law. But it is not settled as far as you are concerned, and you frequently make that argument by refusing to accept Supreme Court rulings that occurred six years ago. Those lower courts that upheld infringements on the Individual Right had it wrong King. Deal with it already. Actually, why don't you just stay out of it. You are not a citizen here. It's none of your business. Work on gun rights in Canada, where you have done absolutely nothing to help.

The best part is where you say you have never written anything that you knew was untrue. But you have been caught in so many lies here, so many times, it's hard to quantify. When you get busted... caught red handed, you resort to denial, or you attempt to distort what you actually said... even when quoted verbatim, as you have done here, or you just drop out of that thread and hide for a few days. But you always re-emerge with more lies for us.

If you seriously think you have never lied to us, you need to print out this whole thread and take it to your Doctor. You need help.



A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.